Trigger Frame NAV Indicator for WLAN Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless local area networks (WLANs) face inefficiencies in resource utilization due to multiple devices sharing resources, with legacy devices often limited by their communication protocols and hardware bandwidth, leading to interference and reduced throughput.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method for setting network allocation vectors (NAV) and using trigger frames to manage channel access, allowing high-efficiency stations to operate on subchannels during designated control periods while legacy devices are excluded, using techniques like OFDMA and MU-MIMO to optimize resource allocation and minimize interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple devices share the same wireless resources, then network coverage and device compatibility are improved, but resource utilization efficiency and throughput deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compatibilityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The wireless channel is segmented into multiple subchannels through OFDMA, allowing different devices to be allocated specific subchannels. This segmentation enables high-efficiency stations to use multiple subchannels while legacy devices use fewer, resolving the contradiction between device compatibility and resource utilization efficiency by giving each device type appropriate access to network resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If legacy devices operate with older protocols, then backward compatibility is maintained, but interference with other transmissions and reduced throughput occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackward compatibilityVSAvoidinterference with other transmissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different quality of service is provided to different device types through selective NAV setting. High-efficiency stations are instructed to set NAV and defer transmission during overlapping BSS periods, while legacy devices operate with their traditional protocols. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by containing legacy device interference to specific time periods while protecting high-efficiency transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If high-efficiency stations use advanced protocols like OFDMA and MU-MIMO, then throughput and resource allocation are improved, but complexity of managing multiple channels and coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidcomplexity of managing multiple channels
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The access point acts as an intermediary that manages the complexity of OFDMA and MU-MIMO operations. It allocates subchannels to stations, sends trigger frames to coordinate transmissions, and manages NAV settings. This intermediary approach resolves the contradiction by centralizing the complex coordination functions, allowing high-efficiency stations to achieve high throughput without each device needing to independently manage the complexity of multiple channel allocations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If NAV is set to prevent interference, then transmission protection is improved, but responsiveness to new transmission opportunities deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission protectionVSAvoidresponsiveness to transmission opportunities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The NAV mechanism is made dynamic through selective application. Stations evaluate whether to set NAV based on their efficiency level and the specific transmission opportunity. High-efficiency stations can choose not to set NAV when responding to trigger frames from their own BSS, allowing rapid response to transmission opportunities while still protecting against overlapping BSS interference. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction between transmission protection and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10420145B2Trigger frame response with network allocation vector
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 INTEL CORP
  • US10420145B2 patent drawing
  • US10420145B2 patent drawing
  • US10420145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer readable media, methods, and apparatuses to determine whether to respond to a frame based on a network allocation vector. An apparatus of a station comprising memory and processing circuitry coupled to the memory is disclosed. The processing circuitry is configured to: decode a frame comprising a first duration and a first transmitter address, if the frame is a trigger frame or a multi-user request-to-send (MU-RTS) frame from a master station of a basic service set (BSS), respond to the trigger frame or the MU-RTS frame if the trigger frame or MU-RTS frame comprises a NAV indicator that indicates not to consider a network allocation vector (NAV). The indication may be an indication in a physical header or an indication in a media access control header.