Trigger Frame Multiuser Signaling for WLAN Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems, particularly in WLAN environments, face challenges with interference and performance degradation due to the lack of efficient multiuser signaling and access request mechanisms, especially in unlicensed bands, which affect the delivery of real-time applications like video traffic and power consumption.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a robust mechanism for uplink multiuser transmission using trigger frames such as CFU and A&T frames, which allow for proper deference and resource allocation among stations, enabling efficient and simultaneous data transfer through orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) and multi-input multi-output (MIMO) techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional single-user signaling mechanisms are used in WLAN environments, then device compatibility is maintained, but interference increases and performance degrades due to lack of efficient multiuser coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the uplink transmission resources by introducing trigger frames that divide the channel access into distinct phases: downlink trigger transmission, SIFS gap, and uplink multiuser transmission. This segmentation allows multiple stations to transmit simultaneously in different resource units (RUs) without collision, resolving the interference problem while maintaining reliable performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The trigger frame acts as an intermediary mechanism between the access point and multiple stations. It coordinates uplink transmissions by specifying resource allocations, transmission parameters, and timing information, enabling efficient multiuser access while preventing the interference that would occur with uncoordinated traditional single-user mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If multiuser transmission mechanisms are implemented, then resource allocation efficiency improves, but system complexity increases due to additional signaling requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidsignaling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger frame is designed as a universal mechanism that handles multiple functions: resource allocation, timing synchronization, power saving control, and multiuser coordination. By consolidating these functions into a single signaling structure, the patent improves resource allocation efficiency without proportionally increasing signaling complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The trigger frame performs preliminary action by pre-allocating resources and specifying transmission parameters before the actual uplink multiuser transmission occurs. This advance coordination eliminates the need for complex real-time negotiation and reduces signaling overhead during the actual data transmission phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring is performed to detect channel availability, then collision avoidance is achieved, but power consumption increases for battery-operated devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action through the structured trigger-based access mechanism where stations wake up at specific intervals to receive trigger frames and transmit uplink data. This replaces continuous monitoring with periodic, event-driven channel access, maintaining collision avoidance through coordinated timing while significantly reducing power consumption for battery-operated devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing stations to autonomously determine their transmission opportunities based on received trigger frames. Stations can independently adjust their monitoring and transmission behavior according to their buffer status and power conditions, eliminating the need for continuous centralized control and reducing overall power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If real-time applications like video traffic are supported, then service quality improves, but interference and performance degradation increase due to lack of efficient access mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication supportVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allocating specific resource units with tailored characteristics to different stations and application requirements. The trigger frame can specify different modulation schemes, coding rates, and resource sizes for different stations, enabling optimized support for real-time applications like video while maintaining overall system performance through localized parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10523379B2Multiuser signaling and access request mechanisms
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 ATLAS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US10523379B2 patent drawing
  • US10523379B2 patent drawing
  • US10523379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example of wireless communications, an access point (AP) may send a first trigger frame to multiple stations. In response, some or all of the stations may transmit their respective uplink frames to the AP. The uplink frames may include status information of the stations such as buffered data size. The AP may send a second trigger frame, including resource allocation assignments to inform stations which sub-bands may be used to send their payloads to the AP. The AP may allocate sub-bands to stations based on the status information of the station. The AP may allocate a relatively narrow sub-band to one or more stations when the status information is not known to the AP. Status information may be provided in certain control fields of a data frame. Random access may be provided by assigning a sub-band to multiple stations. Other methods, apparatus, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.