Vehicular Trip Classification Using Device Interaction Similarity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to accurately classify vehicular trips as personal or non-personal use based on driving data, which is crucial for insurance and business reporting.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that classifies vehicular trips by training a classification model on historic device interaction data from personal and work trips, identifying representative features, and comparing them to baseline features to determine trip purpose.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a classification model is trained on historic device interaction data to classify vehicular trips, then classification accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip classification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the classification task by separating device interaction data collection from trip classification. Device interaction features (music playback, navigation, messaging) are collected and stored separately, then fed into the classification model. This segmentation allows the model to focus on pattern recognition without managing all data processing complexity internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Device interaction features serve as an intermediary between raw driving data and trip classification. Instead of directly analyzing complex driving behavior patterns, the system uses device interaction features as a mediator that captures contextual information about trip purpose, simplifying the classification process while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If device interaction features are collected and analyzed to validate trip classification, then classification reliability is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip classification reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts specific device interaction features (music playback, navigation usage, messaging activity) from the broader set of available driving data. By selectively extracting only the most relevant features for trip classification, the system maintains high reliability while minimizing information loss from unnecessary data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by analyzing only the most pertinent device interaction features rather than processing all possible driving data. This selective approach ensures sufficient information for reliable classification without the excessive processing overhead that would result from analyzing every conceivable data point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260037602A1Systems and methods for validating a vehicular trip classification as for personal use or for work based upon similarity in device interaction features
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 QUANATA LLC
  • US20260037602A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037602A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037602A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method can include receiving a user classification associated with an unlabeled vehicular trip as for work or for personal use. The method can also include determining a classification using a classification model, for the unlabeled vehicular trip as for work or for personal use by at least: determining a first set of baseline device interaction features associated with the first set of historic vehicular trips, determining a second set of baseline device interaction features associated with the second set of historic vehicular trips, determining a set of representative device interaction features associated with the unlabeled vehicular trip, receiving a set of weights associated with the first set of baseline device interaction features, the second set of baseline device interaction features, and the set of representative device interaction features, comparing the set of representative device interaction features against the first set of baseline device interaction features and the second set of baseline device interaction features, and classifying the unlabeled vehicular trip. The method can further comprise validating the user classification. Other embodiments are disclosed.