Trip Combination Planning System for Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional navigation systems require users to manually select and plan individual trips, making it burdensome to combine multiple trips for optimal vehicle usage, as they do not consider combinations that could enhance user benefits such as energy consumption, travel time, or environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that utilize a database of trips with attributive information to automatically select and combine primary and secondary trips based on user habits, evaluating the impact of these combinations to propose advantageous trip combinations, including regular and ongoing trips, to reduce user burden and optimize vehicle usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional navigation systems are used to plan individual trips, then users can reach their destinations, but users must manually select and plan each trip which is burdensome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip planning easeVSAvoidtime for trip planning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically plans trip combinations by itself without requiring manual user input for each trip. It retrieves user habits from the database, identifies combinable trips, and generates optimized trip combinations autonomously, making the system serve itself in the trip planning task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-stores user habit information including regular trips, departure times, destinations, and vehicle usage patterns in a database. This preliminary data collection and organization enables automatic trip combination planning without requiring users to input trip details each time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If users manually combine multiple trips for optimal vehicle usage, then vehicle usage efficiency can be improved, but the planning process becomes even more burdensome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle usage efficiencyVSAvoidtrip combination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies which trips can be combined and how to combine them optimally. It retrieves user habits, analyzes trip compatibility based on time and location, and generates combined trip plans without requiring users to manually evaluate or combine trips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses stored user habit information as feedback to automatically adjust and optimize trip combinations. By analyzing past trip patterns, the system learns user preferences and automatically generates combinations that align with established habits, reducing the need for complex manual planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional systems evaluate trips based on individual attributes, then single trip optimization is achieved, but combination of trips for multiple benefits is not considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip combination flexibilityVSAvoidautomatic trip combination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates trip combinations based on multiple criteria simultaneously including energy consumption, travel time, and environmental impact. It can propose combinations that optimize for different objectives depending on user needs, making the system versatile in handling various trip planning scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs the complex evaluation and combination of multiple trips based on stored user habits and trip attributes. It retrieves relevant information, analyzes compatibility, and generates optimized combinations without requiring user intervention in the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8855913B2Apparatus for planning trips combination, method for the same, and program for the same
Publication Date: 2014.10.07 DENSO CORP
  • US8855913B2 patent drawing
  • US8855913B2 patent drawing
  • US8855913B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive management system proposes a trips combination, such as a combination of two regular trips and/or a side trip from an ongoing trip. A trips database stores a plurality of trips including regular trips. A regular trips combination proposing module automatically creates a trips combination of regular trips and proposes the trips combination to a user. The real-time trips combination proposing module finds out a trip combinable with an ongoing trip based on short-term needs which are retrieved from the trips database and proposes the trips combination to a user. The system proposes the trips combination and shows an impact which will be caused by the proposed trips combination. As a result, it is possible to support a user to plan a trips combination advantageous in some aspect.