Vehicle Trip Complexity Scoring for Insurance Premiums

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The insurance industry lacks an accurate and objective measure to assess route complexity, which is correlated with the likelihood of accidents and losses, using high-frequency location and vehicle data such as speed, orientation, and acceleration.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system and method that calculates a complexity score for vehicle trips based on fractal dimension, changes in orientation, speed, acceleration, and jerk, using telematics data from sensors, to determine driver risk and adjust insurance premiums accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional insurance pricing methods are used, then pricing is simple and based on basic factors, but the ability to accurately assess driver risk and route complexity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of driver risk assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of pricing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/simple pricing methods with a computational system that uses fractal dimension analysis and telematics data processing to objectively measure route complexity and assess driver risk, enabling more precise pricing decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces new parameters for risk assessment including fractal dimension of routes, changes in orientation, speed, acceleration, and jerk, transforming the pricing system from basic factors to a multi-parameter analytical model that captures route complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If high-frequency telematics data is collected and analyzed, then route complexity can be objectively measured, but data processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity of route complexity measurementVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes manual or simple data collection with automated telematics sensors and computational algorithms that objectively measure route complexity through fractal dimension analysis, transforming subjective assessment into objective quantitative measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces fractal dimension as an intermediary metric that simplifies the complex relationship between raw telematics data and route complexity, providing a standardized way to quantify and compare different routes without processing every individual data point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If route complexity is used as a pricing factor, then insurance pricing becomes more accurate, but the system requires integration with telematics sensors and data systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of insurance pricingVSAvoidintegration requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the pricing system multi-functional by integrating it with telematics sensors and data systems, allowing the same infrastructure to serve multiple purposes including risk assessment, route analysis, and premium calculation, thereby improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8799035B2System and method for determining an insurance premium based on complexity of a vehicle trip
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
  • US8799035B2 patent drawing
  • US8799035B2 patent drawing
  • US8799035B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed herein for pricing an insurance premium based on route complexity. The system includes a computer memory and a processor in communication with the computer memory. The computer memory stores telematics data received from a sensor within a vehicle. The telematics data includes at least one of geo-position information of the vehicle and vehicle kinematics data. The processor is configured to compute a complexity score of the trip based on the telematics data. The processor is also configured to determine a price for automobile insurance for the driver based on the complexity score of the at least one trip.