Autonomous Vehicle Trip-State Interfaces for Adaptive Passenger Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle systems lack efficient methods to dynamically adapt and communicate with passengers based on the state of a trip, leading to suboptimal user experience and resource inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A state-based autonomous-vehicle operation system that determines the current trip state and adjusts interfaces and vehicle parameters accordingly, utilizing computing devices onboard and separate from the vehicle to provide tailored passenger interactions and optimize resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle system continuously monitors and processes all passenger actions and vehicle states, then the passenger experience can be enhanced through personalized interfaces, but the computational resources and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger experience adaptationVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the trip into distinct states (e.g., pickup, transit, destination) and divides the interface adaptation into state-specific rendering tasks. The computing system processes only the subset of passenger actions and vehicle parameters relevant to the current state, rather than continuously analyzing all possible data streams. This segmentation reduces computational overhead while maintaining personalized adaptation throughout the journey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic state determination and interface rendering updates synchronized with trip milestones rather than continuous processing. The computing system evaluates passenger actions and determines current trip states at discrete intervals (e.g., upon detecting specific passenger behaviors or reaching geographic waypoints), then renders appropriate interfaces only at these periodic moments, significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system renders multiple different interfaces for different computing devices simultaneously, then passenger customization is improved, but the system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice-specific interface customizationVSAvoidinterface management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by rendering different interface configurations tailored to each computing device's specific characteristics (e.g., smartphone vs. tablet vs. in-vehicle display) based on the current trip state. Each device receives customized interface data optimized for its form factor, capabilities, and context, rather than a uniform interface across all devices. This approach enhances customization while managing complexity through state-based template selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by generating interface representations from standardized templates specific to each trip state, then distributing these copied interface definitions to multiple computing devices. Rather than creating entirely unique interfaces for each device, the system copies and adapts state-specific interface templates, reducing the overall complexity of interface management while maintaining device-specific customization through parameter substitution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If the autonomous vehicle processes and responds to all passenger actions in real-time, then the responsiveness and user satisfaction improve, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem responsivenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-defining trip states and their corresponding interface configurations before the actual trip occurs. The system establishes a framework of possible states (pickup, en route, approaching destination, etc.) and their associated interface renderings in advance. During the trip, the computing system only needs to determine which pre-defined state is currently active and retrieve the corresponding pre-prepared interface, significantly reducing real-time processing requirements while maintaining responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250207923A1State-based autonomous-vehicle operations
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250207923A1 patent drawing
  • US20250207923A1 patent drawing
  • US20250207923A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to state-based autonomous-vehicle operations. In particular, the methods, devices, and systems of the present disclosure can: determine, based at least in part on one or more actions of a passenger associated with a trip of an autonomous vehicle, a current state of the trip from amongst a plurality of different predefined states of the trip; identify, based at least in part on the current state of the trip, one or more computing devices associated with the passenger; generate, based at least in part on the current state of the trip, data describing one or more interfaces for display by the computing device(s) associated with the passenger; and communicate, to the computing device(s) associated with the passenger, the data describing the interface(s) for display.