Triphasic Pulses for Cochlear Implant Somatic Response Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cochlear implants often experience undesired somatic responses such as facial nerve twitching and other unwanted effects due to electrical stimulation, limiting the ability to set sufficient stimulation intensity for effective hearing.

Innovation Solution

The use of triphasic stimulation pulses, with controlled inter-phase gaps, is introduced to reduce these adverse responses by adapting the signal format based on somatic response input signals, allowing for charge-balanced pulses that can be applied sequentially or in parallel to electrode contacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electrical stimulation intensity is increased to improve hearing effectiveness, then hearing quality is improved, but undesired somatic responses such as facial nerve twitching occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehearing effectivenessVSAvoidsomatic responses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The electrical stimulation pulse is divided into three distinct phases (first phase, second phase, and third phase) instead of using a conventional single biphasic pulse. This segmentation allows each phase to be independently controlled and optimized to stimulate auditory nerve fibers while minimizing activation of extra-cochlear structures that cause somatic responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different phases of the pulse are applied with different characteristics (amplitude, duration, polarity) tailored to locally stimulate specific regions of the cochlear electrode array. The first and third phases use one polarity while the second phase uses opposite polarity, creating localized stimulation patterns that enhance auditory perception without activating surrounding tissues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If conventional biphasic pulses are used to simplify the stimulation signal, then device complexity is reduced, but undesired somatic responses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal format complexityVSAvoidsomatic responses
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pulse generator is configured to dynamically switch between different pulse formats (biphasic and triphasic) based on real-time detection of somatic responses. When somatic responses are detected, the system automatically transitions to triphasic pulses; when they are not present, the system uses simpler biphasic pulses, optimizing the balance between complexity and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where somatic response detection circuits monitor for unwanted responses during stimulation. Based on this feedback, the control circuit adjusts the pulse format in real-time, switching between biphasic and triphasic patterns to maintain effective hearing stimulation while avoiding somatic effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If triphasic pulses with inter-phase gaps are used to reduce somatic responses, then hearing quality is improved, but stimulation rate is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehearing qualityVSAvoidstimulation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The triphasic pulse pattern applies stimulation in three partial phases within a single stimulation cycle rather than one continuous phase. By distributing the total charge across three phases with appropriate inter-phase gaps, the system achieves effective neural stimulation while the gaps prevent excessive current accumulation that would cause somatic responses, maintaining an acceptable overall stimulation rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Triphasic stimulation pulses significantly reduce undesired somatic responses while maintaining desired loudness perception, offering a potential solution to mitigate side effects and enhance cochlear implant usability.

Implementation Method 1

a cochlear implant with an implanted stimulation electrode can electrically stimulate auditory nerve tissue with small currents delivered by multiple electrode contacts distributed along the electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS9545516B2Triphasic pulses to reduce undesirable side-effects in cochlear implants
Publication Date: 2017.01.17 MED EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
  • US9545516B2 patent drawing
  • US9545516B2 patent drawing
  • US9545516B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement is described for generating electrode stimulation signals to electrode contacts in an implanted cochlear implant electrode array. A signal processor processes an input sound signal to generate stimulation timing signals for signal channels associated with the electrode contacts. A pulse generator produces the electrode stimulation signals for each electrode contact based on the stimulation timing signals. A pulse adapter controls a signal format of the pulse generator in response to a somatic response input signal reflecting presence or absence of an undesired somatic response to the electrode stimulation signals. The signal format is an initial signal format based on biphasic stimulation pulses when the somatic response input signal reflects absence of the undesired somatic response, and an adapted signal form based on triphasic stimulation pulses when the somatic response input signal reflects presence of the undesired somatic response.