Triple Glazing Manufacturing via Simultaneous Gas Injection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing method for manufacturing triple glazing is time-consuming as it involves manufacturing a double glazing first and then modifying it to include a third sheet of glass, resulting in a process that takes twice as long as manufacturing a double glazing.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves pre-assembling three sheets of glass with spacers at an initial workstation, filling the cavities between them with gas simultaneously at a second workstation, and then pressing the sheets together to seal the triple glazing at a third workstation, allowing for simultaneous processing and significant time savings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the traditional two-stage manufacturing method is used (first making double glazing, then adding third sheet), then the manufacturing process is simple and follows existing procedures, but the production time doubles compared to double glazing manufacturing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is divided into three independent workstations (pre-assembly, filling, pressing) that operate simultaneously on three separate glass sheets, allowing parallel processing rather than sequential assembly of double-glazed units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Three glass sheets are pre-positioned in the final configuration with cavities formed between them before gas filling, eliminating the need to first complete double glazing assembly and then modify it for triple glazing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If three sheets of glass are positioned inclined by an angle between 0° and 10° with respect to adjacent sheets, then the cavities can be filled with gas simultaneously, but the positioning and alignment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas filling efficiencyVSAvoidpositioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The glass sheets are positioned at a slight inclination (0°-10°) rather than perfectly parallel, creating a dynamic configuration that allows gas to flow into cavities from the bottom while maintaining structural stability during the filling process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The inclined positioning creates an intermediate state where cavities are accessible for gas injection without requiring complex sealing or closing mechanisms during the filling operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If heavy gas is injected into the cavities, then thermal insulation performance improves, but the gas injection system requires higher pressure and more robust equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal insulation performanceVSAvoidgas injection system requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Heavy gas (such as argon or krypton) is injected into the cavities to provide superior thermal insulation performance, utilizing the density and thermal properties of these gases to reduce heat transfer through the glazing unit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the manufacturing of triple glazing at a speed comparable to double glazing production, with improved efficiency and reduced stress on the glass sheets, resulting in a more gastight and thermally insulated product.

Implementation Method 1

a step of filling the two cavities by injecting gas into the two cavities at the same time using nozzles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas injection:

Implementation Method 2

a step of pressing the sheets of glass against one another in order to seal the triple glazing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical pressing: Compression

Implementation Method 3

the sheets of glass adjacent to the sheet of glass situated between the other two are held in position by suction cups

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 4

the sheet of glass situated between the other two is held in position by grippers which clamp either the two faces of the sheet of glass near its edge, or the edge face of the sheet of glass at various points thereon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical clamping: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 5

the filling step comprises a prior step during which a vacuum is created in the cavities before the gas is injected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS9790733B2Method of manufacturing a gas-filled triple glazing
Publication Date: 2017.10.17 GLASTON GERMANY GMBH
  • US9790733B2 patent drawing
  • US9790733B2 patent drawing
  • US9790733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a gas-filled triple glazing, including: a pre-assembly during which three sheets of glass are positioned beside one another, at least one of the sheets of glass including a spacer, each sheet of glass being positioned inclined by an angle between 0° and 10° with respect to an adjacent sheet of glass, to form two cavities, each of the cavities being between two adjacent sheets of glass; filling the two cavities by injecting gas into the two cavities at a same time using nozzles; pressing the sheets of glass against one another to seal the triple glazing. The method allows triple glazing to be manufactured quickly.