Triple-Layer Interlayer Structure for Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Media

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current perpendicular magnetic recording media face challenges in achieving high areal recording densities and cost-effective manufacturing due to the high cost and limited availability of ruthenium (Ru) in interlayer structures, which are crucial for maintaining performance characteristics like bit error rate and signal-to-noise ratio.

Innovation Solution

A triple-layer stacked interlayer structure is introduced, comprising a Ru-containing first layer, a non-Ru containing second layer, and a Ru-containing third layer, which reduces the overall Ru content while maintaining the performance of dual-layer Ru-containing structures, using materials like RuX, Y, and Ru-based alloys to facilitate crystallographic orientation and physical separation of magnetic grains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dual-layer Ru-containing interlayer structure is used, then magnetic recording performance (bit error rate, signal-to-noise ratio) is maintained, but Ru consumption and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic recording performanceVSAvoidRu consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The interlayer structure is segmented into three distinct layers: a first Ru-containing layer (5-20 nm), a non-Ru containing intermediate layer (10-50 nm), and a second Ru-containing layer (5-20 nm). This segmentation allows reduction of total Ru content while maintaining the functional benefits of Ru-containing structures for crystallographic orientation and magnetic grain separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The non-Ru containing intermediate layer is introduced with specific local properties (different from Ru layers) to provide particular functions such as enhanced crystallographic orientation control or stress management, while the Ru-containing layers maintain their specific qualities for magnetic grain separation and interface quality. This local differentiation optimizes overall performance while reducing Ru consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If Ru content in interlayer structure is reduced, then manufacturing cost decreases, but magnetic recording performance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidmagnetic recording performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The thickness parameters of the Ru-containing layers are optimized to 5-20 nm each, and the non-Ru intermediate layer is set at 10-50 nm. These parameter changes maintain sufficient Ru content for performance while reducing total Ru consumption compared to thicker dual-layer Ru structures. The specific thickness range balances cost reduction with performance maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If triple-layer interlayer structure is implemented, then Ru consumption is reduced, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRu consumptionVSAvoidinterlayer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The triple-layer structure combines Ru-containing layers (for magnetic grain separation and interface quality) with a non-Ru intermediate layer (for crystallographic orientation) into a unified interlayer system. This merging of different material functionalities into a single integrated structure achieves performance benefits while managing complexity through functional integration rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The triple-layer interlayer structure achieves comparable performance to dual-layer Ru-containing structures with significantly reduced Ru consumption, enhancing the cost-effectiveness and scalability of high-performance granular perpendicular magnetic recording media.

Implementation Method 1

an interlayer structure for crystallographically orienting a layer of a perpendicular magnetic recording material formed thereon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxy: Epitaxy

Implementation Method 2

formed by sputter deposition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSputtering: Sputtering

Data Source

PatentUS8025993B2Recording media interlayer structure
Publication Date: 2011.09.27 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US8025993B2 patent drawing
  • US8025993B2 patent drawing
  • US8025993B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A perpendicular magnetic recording medium comprises a layer stack formed over a surface of a non-magnetic substrate, and comprising, in overlying sequence from the surface: a magnetically soft underlayer; an interlayer structure for crystallographically orienting a layer of a perpendicular magnetic recording material formed thereon; and at least one crystallographically oriented, magnetically hard, perpendicular magnetic recording layer on the interlayer structure; wherein the interlayer structure is a triple-layer stacked structure comprising: a first interlayer of a first non-magnetic material proximal the magnetically soft underlayer and containing Ru; a second interlayer of a second non-magnetic material in overlying contact with the first interlayer and not containing Ru; and a third interlayer of a third non-magnetic material in overlying contact with the second interlayer and containing Ru.