Tripod CV Joint Curved Guide Surfaces for Smooth No-Torque Sliding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tripod type constant velocity universal joints experience increased frictional forces and hindered smooth sliding of rollers under no torque conditions due to a reduced contact angle between the roller and roller guide surfaces, leading to potential operational issues.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a configuration where the outer peripheral surface of the roller is partially spherical with a curvature center on the leg shaft axis, and the roller guide surfaces are partially cylindrical with a curvature center aligned with the track groove intersection, setting a contact ratio of 0.95≤R/r≤1.08 to ensure a large contact angle and smooth sliding under no torque conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the roller guide surfaces are formed with a large curvature radius R, then the roller can accommodate axial displacement, but the contact angle between the roller and roller guide surface is reduced, increasing frictional force under no torque conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial displacement capabilityVSAvoidfrictional force
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The roller guide surface is designed with different curvature radii in different regions: a large curvature radius R1 in the axial direction to accommodate axial displacement, and a small curvature radius R2 in the radial direction to maintain a large contact angle and reduce frictional force under no torque conditions. This local differentiation of geometric properties resolves the contradiction between axial adaptability and friction reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If the roller guide surfaces are formed with a large curvature radius R, then the roller can accommodate axial displacement, but smooth sliding under no torque conditions is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial displacement capabilityVSAvoidsmooth sliding
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The roller guide surface is designed with different curvature radii in different regions: a large curvature radius R1 in the axial direction to accommodate axial displacement, and a small curvature radius R2 in the radial direction to maintain a large contact angle and reduce frictional force under no torque conditions. This local differentiation of geometric properties resolves the contradiction between axial adaptability and friction reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If the roller and roller guide surface contact at one point (circular contact), then the structure is simple, but edge loads and contact pressure increase under no torque conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact geometry simplicityVSAvoidcontact pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The roller guide surface is designed with curved surfaces having specific curvature radii (R1 in axial direction, R2 in radial direction) to transform the contact from point contact to surface contact. This curvature design increases the contact area between the roller and guide surface, distributing the load and reducing contact pressure and edge loads under no torque conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration allows the rollers to smoothly slide on the guide surfaces even when no torque is applied, reducing frictional forces and enhancing durability by minimizing edge loads and contact pressure.

Implementation Method 1

the roller rolls on the roller guide surfaces properly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling: Roller

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of needle rollers interposed between the roller and the inner ring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling contact: Roller

Data Source

PatentEP4160031B1Tripod-type constant-velocity universal joint
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 NTN CORP
  • EP4160031B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4160031B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4160031B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Provided is a tripod type constant velocity universal joint (1), including: an outer joint member (2) having three track grooves (5) each including roller guide surfaces (6) arranged so as to be opposed to each other in a circumferential direction of each of the track grooves; a tripod member (3) including three leg shafts (7) projecting in a radial direction of the tripod member; and roller units (4) each including a roller (11) and an inner ring (12) configured to support the roller (11) in a freely rotatable manner, in which an outer peripheral surface (1 1a) of the roller (11) is formed of a partially spherical surface having a curvature center on an axis (7x) of each of the leg shafts (7), in which the roller guide surfaces (6) are each formed of a partially cylindrical surface having a curvature center on a horizontal line (X-X) passing an intersection (T) of a pitch circle (PC) of the track grooves (5) and a center line (5x) of each of the track grooves (5), and in which under a state in which no torque is applied to the joint, an end portion (11e) of the outer peripheral surface (11a) of the roller (11) is held in abutment against the roller guide surfaces (6).