Trisilane Silicon Layer Formation at Low Temperatures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge is to form smooth n-type doped silicon films at an acceptable deposition rate, as reducing deposition temperatures to achieve smoother films leads to unacceptably low deposition rates due to dopant poisoning of the substrate surface, making it difficult to balance smoothness and throughput in semiconductor processing.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of trisilane as a silicon precursor and an n-type dopant precursor, such as phosphine, in a batch process chamber, where the deposition conditions are set to operate in the kinetic regime, allowing for the formation of very smooth and conformal n-type doped silicon layers with high deposition rates, independent of the dopant precursor flow rate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If deposition temperature is reduced to achieve smoother films, then film smoothness is improved, but deposition rate decreases to unacceptably low levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm smoothnessVSAvoiddeposition rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the deposition system by switching from silane to trisilane as the silicon precursor gas. This parameter change enables the deposition process to operate at lower temperatures (reducing thermal budget) while maintaining high deposition rates, thereby achieving smooth films without the typical trade-off of reduced productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a specific dopant precursor that acts as an intermediary substance. This dopant precursor enables n-type doping during deposition without causing the surface poisoning effect that normally occurs with conventional dopants, thus maintaining high deposition rates even at lower temperatures where smooth films are formed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If n-type dopant is introduced during deposition to form doped films, then doping is achieved, but deposition surface is poisoned causing strong reduction in deposition rate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedopant incorporationVSAvoiddeposition rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a specially selected dopant precursor as an intermediary that delivers dopant atoms to the growing film without causing surface poisoning. This intermediary approach allows n-type doping to occur during deposition while maintaining high deposition rates, avoiding the harmful side effects of conventional dopant introduction methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical form and delivery mechanism of the dopant by using a dopant precursor instead of conventional dopant sources. This parameter change in dopant delivery enables dopant incorporation without the adverse surface poisoning effect, thus maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If deposition temperature is reduced to deposit smoother n-type doped films, then film smoothness is improved, but deposition rate falls to unacceptably low levels due to combined effects of temperature reduction and dopant poisoning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm smoothnessVSAvoiddeposition rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simultaneously changes two critical parameters: the silicon precursor (from silane to trisilane) and the dopant delivery method (using dopant precursor). These combined parameter changes enable the deposition of smooth n-type doped films at lower temperatures without the deposition rate penalty that would normally result from temperature reduction and dopant poisoning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The dopant precursor serves as an intermediary that enables n-type doping during low-temperature deposition without causing surface poisoning. This intermediary approach resolves the combined problem of temperature reduction and dopant poisoning, allowing smooth film formation at acceptable deposition rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of uniformly thin, continuous doped silicon films with high smoothness and high throughput, facilitating the production of semiconductor devices with smaller circuit dimensions and higher reliability, while reducing thermal budgets and maintaining acceptable deposition rates at lower temperatures.

Implementation Method 1

depositing a silicon layer on a plurality of substrates in a batch process chamber by exposing the substrates to trisilane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Vapour Deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

The silicon layer is doped by exposing the substrates to an n-type dopant precursor during at least part of the deposition of the silicon layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Vapour Deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS7718518B2Low temperature doped silicon layer formation
Publication Date: 2010.05.18 ASM INTERNATIONAL NV
  • US7718518B2 patent drawing
  • US7718518B2 patent drawing
  • US7718518B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A doped silicon layer is formed in a batch process chamber at low temperatures. The silicon precursor for the silicon layer formation is a polysilane, such as trisilane, and the dopant precursor is an n-type dopant, such as phosphine. The silicon precursor can be flowed into the process chamber with the flow of the dopant precursor or separately from the flow of the dopant precursor. Surprisingly, deposition rate is independent of dopant precursor flow, while dopant incorporation linearly increases with the dopant precursor flow.