Trochoidal Grinding of Ceramic Matrix Composites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Composite materials used in aero gas turbine engines, such as ceramic matrix composites, are difficult to machine with conventional chip-forming methods due to sensitivity to cutting forces, leading to issues like delamination, chipping, and fibre damage, resulting in low efficiencies and dimensional variability.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a rotating abrasive grinding tool that follows a trochoidal path with reduced radial depth of cut, high rotation speed, and varying feed rate to minimize machining forces and temperatures, while using the abrasive tool's micro-cutting edges to effectively machine ceramic materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional chip-forming cutting methods are used, then material can be removed from composite materials, but cutting forces cause delamination, chipping, and fibre damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoiddimensional quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional chip-forming mechanical cutting methods with an abrasive grinding process. The abrasive grinding tool uses friction and abrasion rather than chip formation to remove material, eliminating the cutting forces that cause delamination and chipping while maintaining effective material removal capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental machining parameters by using abrasive grains with varying sizes and hardness to create controlled material removal. The abrasive process uses different mechanical principles (friction, compression, abrasion) compared to conventional cutting, allowing material removal without the harmful cutting forces that damage composite structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If gentle cutting conditions are applied to avoid delamination and chipping, then component quality is maintained, but machining efficiency and material removal rate decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional qualityVSAvoidmachining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the gentle cutting conditions approach with a fundamentally different abrasive grinding mechanism. Instead of trying to reduce cutting forces to acceptable levels, the system uses abrasive grains that remove material through friction and abrasion, achieving both high quality surface finish and acceptable machining rates without the trade-off present in conventional cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If high rotation speed and varying feed rate are used, then machining rates and tool life increase, but machining forces and temperatures must be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall machining rateVSAvoidmachining temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action through the trochoidal path, where the abrasive tool alternates between cutting and non-cutting phases. This periodic engagement allows heat to dissipate during the non-cutting portions of the cycle, preventing excessive temperature buildup even at high rotation speeds, while maintaining high average material removal rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension to the machining process through cyclic variation of feed rate and rotation speed. By varying parameters over time rather than maintaining constant values, the system can sustain high average productivity while allowing temperature to remain within acceptable ranges through periodic reduction in cutting intensity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the risks of delamination, chipping, and fibre damage, increases machining rates and tool life, and decreases cycle times and costs, while maintaining high dimensional quality.

Implementation Method 1

performing a machining operation by moving a rotating, abrasive grinding tool along a feed direction to remove material from the component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS11267096B2Manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US11267096B2 patent drawing
  • US11267096B2 patent drawing
  • US11267096B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a component is provided. The method includes performing a machining operation by moving a rotating, abrasive grinding tool along a feed direction to remove material from the component. At least the part of the component from which the material is removed is formed of composite material. The abrasive grinding tool follows a trochoidal path along the feed direction.