Trolley Locking Unit for Robotic Surgical Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prior trolleys for washing and disinfecting robotic surgical instruments face issues such as complex and expensive individual locking systems, labor-intensive operation, structural and functional drawbacks like degree of freedom in nozzle positioning, geometric constraints, and limited design flexibility, which affect the reliability and versatility of the locking mechanism.

Innovation Solution

A trolley with a locking system featuring a rotating locking unit that moves in a plane parallel to the brackets, utilizing a guide shaped like a J and an engagement plate performing a rototranslation movement, ensuring complete locking without axial displacement, and accommodating instruments with irrigation ports on both the front and top sides.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual locking is implemented for each instrument, then the reliability of locking is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidlocking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple locking functions into a single centralized locking unit that can simultaneously lock all instruments connected to the manifold. This single locking unit integrates the functionality of multiple individual locks, reducing device complexity while maintaining reliable locking of all instruments through a unified mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking unit is designed with multi-functionality to handle various instrument types and configurations through a single device. It can lock instruments with different irrigation port positions (front or top) and accommodate multiple nozzle arrangements, eliminating the need for separate locking mechanisms for each instrument type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If individual locking is implemented for each instrument, then the locking precision is improved, but the time required for operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking precisionVSAvoidoperating time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple locking operations into a single simultaneous action. The centralized locking unit enables all instruments to be locked at the same time through one operation, eliminating the sequential time required for individual locking while maintaining precise engagement through the unified locking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If rotation around a fixed axis is used for locking, then the ease of operation is improved, but the adaptability to different instrument positions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking operation easeVSAvoidinstrument position adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The locking unit incorporates dynamic movement capabilities with multiple degrees of freedom, allowing it to adapt to different instrument positions. The unit can rotate and translate along guided paths to engage with instruments regardless of whether their irrigation ports are positioned at the front or top, maintaining ease of operation while increasing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking unit moves from simple rotation around a fixed axis to a more complex motion that includes translation along multiple axes. This dimensional expansion allows the locking unit to reach and engage instruments with various port positions, accommodating both front-mounted and top-mounted irrigation ports through multi-axis movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If axial displacement is used for engagement, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the harmful factors such as friction and transverse force increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking system manufacture easeVSAvoidfriction and transverse force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The locking unit employs dynamic movement along guided paths that combine rotation and translation, eliminating the need for pure axial displacement. This dynamic engagement reduces friction between the locking unit and instrument components, and the guided motion prevents generation of harmful transverse forces that could damage nozzles or insertion seats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3677214B1Trolley for washing and disinfecting robotic surgical instruments
Publication Date: 2020.11.18 BONFERRARO SPA
  • EP3677214B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3677214B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP3677214B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

A trolley for a machine for washing and disinfecting robotic surgical instruments (R) includes a manifold (1) equipped with flexible washing tubes provided with end nozzles (2) and a support (4) with seats for said robotic surgical instruments (R) which is provided with a system (5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) for the simultaneous locking of all the instruments (R) placed in said seats.