Dual Trop-2 and Nectin-4 ADC Combination Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for relapsed or refractory locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, such as ADCs, face limitations due to tumor heterogeneity, emergence of resistant clones, and tolerability issues, leading to suboptimal clinical outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A combination therapy approach using a therapeutically effective amount of a Trop-2 antibody-drug conjugate (Trop-2 ADC) and a Nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate (Nectin-4 ADC) is administered to patients, potentially alongside an anti-PD-1 antibody or anti-PD-L1 antibody, to enhance efficacy and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ADC monotherapy is used to treat relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma, then treatment simplicity is maintained, but clinical efficacy is limited due to tumor heterogeneity and resistant clones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical efficacyVSAvoidtreatment regimen complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines two different ADCs (Trop-2 ADC and Nectin-4 ADC) into a single treatment regimen to address tumor heterogeneity and prevent resistant clone emergence. This merging of therapies targets multiple antigens simultaneously, improving clinical efficacy while managing the complexity through a coordinated combination approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If combination therapy with multiple ADCs is used to overcome tumor heterogeneity, then clinical efficacy is improved, but tolerability and safety profile worsen due to cumulative toxicities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical efficacyVSAvoidtreatment toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies dosing parameters of the combination therapy, including dose reduction of one or both ADCs, extended dosing intervals, or sequential administration schedules. These parameter changes maintain the synergistic anti-tumor effect while reducing cumulative toxicities to acceptable levels, thereby improving the therapeutic index.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If higher doses of ADC are administered to improve response rate, then antitumor efficacy increases, but treatment-related adverse events increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall response rateVSAvoidserious treatment-related adverse events
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines two ADCs with different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles (Trop-2 ADC targeting neuronal tissues and Nectin-4 ADC targeting renal tissues) to achieve synergistic anti-tumor effects at lower individual doses. This combination approach improves overall response rate while distributing and managing toxicities across different organ systems, reducing serious treatment-related adverse events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250135019A1Combination therapies for treating cancers
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 GILEAD SCIENCES INC
  • US20250135019A1 patent drawing
  • US20250135019A1 patent drawing
  • US20250135019A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides methods for treating cancer in a patient, the methods including administering a combination therapy comprising dual antibody drug conjugates. In some embodiments the combination therapy comprises (i) a therapeutically effective amount of a Trop-2 antibody-drug conjugate (Trop-2 ADC), (ii) a therapeutically effective amount of a Nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate (Nectin-4 ADC), and, optionally, (iii) a therapeutically effective amount of an anti-PD(L)-1 antibody. In some embodiments, the cancer is urothelial carcinoma.