Tropical TEBD Algorithm for Combinatorial Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current algorithms for combinatorial optimization, including quantum-inspired methods, struggle to outperform classical algorithms like Gurobi optimizer for small and medium-sized problems, and face challenges with scalability and computational efficiency as the number of input variables and constraints increases.

Innovation Solution

The adaptation of the Time-Evolving Block Decimation (TEBD) algorithm to use tropical algebra instead of regular algebra, allowing it to solve classical combinatorial optimization problems more efficiently by exploiting the classical structure of the problem and improving computational resource optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If quantum-inspired algorithms are used to solve combinatorial optimization problems, then computational efficiency may be improved for large-scale problems, but they currently fail to outperform classical algorithms like Gurobi optimizer for small and medium-sized problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidalgorithm performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the quantum-inspired TEBD algorithm by changing the algebraic parameters from regular algebra to tropical algebra. This parameter change allows the algorithm to exploit the classical structure of combinatorial optimization problems, enabling it to outperform both classical algorithms and quantum devices for large-scale problems while maintaining competitiveness across all problem sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of input variables and constraints in combinatorial optimization problems increases, then the problem scale and complexity increase, but computational efficiency and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem scaleVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by decomposing the time-evolution operator into smaller, manageable components that can be applied iteratively. This segmentation allows the algorithm to handle large-scale problems with many variables and constraints by breaking down the computational task into sequential steps, maintaining efficiency even as problem scale increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By changing from regular algebra to tropical algebra, the algorithm fundamentally alters how computational operations are performed, enabling it to scale efficiently with increasing problem size. The tropical algebra operations exploit the classical structure of the optimization problem to maintain computational efficiency regardless of the number of input variables and constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If classical algorithms like Gurobi optimizer are used, then they provide reliable solutions for small and medium-sized problems, but they struggle to scale to large-sized problems with many variables and constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution accuracyVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces tropical algebra as an intermediary framework that bridges the gap between quantum-inspired approaches and classical optimization structures. This intermediary allows the algorithm to maintain the reliability and solution accuracy of classical methods while achieving the scalability needed for large-sized problems through efficient exploitation of problem structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250036719A1Method and System for Combinatorial Optimisation of Cost Functions
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 MULTIVERSE COMPUTING SL
  • US20250036719A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036719A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036719A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This document teaches a computer implemented method for solving a combinatorial optimization problem of a cost function implemented on a digital computer system comprising a processor (10) adapted to execute a time evolving block decimation (TEBD) algorithm. The method comprises mapping the cost function to a Hamiltonian (H(x1, x2, . . . xn)) in a mapping module (80), choosing an initial state of a vector space (V) representative of the cost function, applying a time-evolution operator (O) to the state to produce an updated state, iteratively applying the time-evolution operator to the updated state to produce a further updated state until a ground state is reached, and determining the cost function from the ground state of the Hamiltonian.