Tropical TEBD Algorithm for Integer Factorization Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing classical algorithms for integer factorization, such as the Schnorr's algorithm, face challenges in efficiently solving the Closest Vector Problem (CVP) due to their inability to achieve high accuracy, which limits their effectiveness in factoring large numbers, especially when adapted for lattice-based cryptography.

Innovation Solution

Adaptation of the Time-Evolving Block Decimation (TEBD) algorithm using tropical algebra to improve the CVP step in the Schnorr's algorithm, employing a tropical TEBD algorithm that leverages tropical geometry to optimize the classical optimization problem, reducing the need for complex matrix operations and addressing issues of entanglement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If classical algorithms (e.g., Schnorr's algorithm) are used to solve the Closest Vector Problem in integer factorization, then the algorithm can be implemented on classical computers, but the accuracy and efficiency of finding prime factors deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of CVP solutionVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the classical CVP problem into a quantum-inspired optimization problem by changing the parameter space from classical lattice vectors to quantum state representations. This allows the system to explore the solution space more efficiently while maintaining classical computer implementation, thereby improving accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a quantum-inspired intermediate representation layer that bridges classical computation and quantum optimization. This intermediary uses tensor networks to represent the CVP problem in a form that can be solved with higher accuracy on classical hardware, effectively mediating between the limitations of classical algorithms and the need for precise factorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If quantum algorithms (e.g., Shor's algorithm) are used for integer factorization, then the computational efficiency improves with polynomial scaling, but the requirement for quantum computer hardware increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefactorization speedVSAvoidquantum computer requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a classical copy of quantum optimization techniques by implementing tensor network methods on classical computers. This copying approach captures the essential efficiency benefits of quantum algorithms (polynomial scaling) while avoiding the need for actual quantum hardware, thus improving productivity without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the physical quantum mechanical system with a classical computational system that uses tensor networks. This replacement maintains the mathematical structure and efficiency advantages of quantum algorithms while eliminating the requirement for quantum computer hardware, effectively replacing the mechanical quantum system with a classical analog.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If brute force algorithm is used for integer factorization, then the implementation is simple, but the time complexity becomes exponential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm implementation simplicityVSAvoidfactorization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the factorization problem into smaller sub-problems that can be solved using tensor network methods. By dividing the large integer factorization into manageable blocks that can be processed independently and then combined, the system maintains implementation simplicity while dramatically reducing the exponential time complexity of brute force approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4531330A1Tensor network-enhanced prime factorization
Publication Date: 2025.04.02 MULTIVERSE COMPUTING SL
  • EP4531330A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4531330A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4531330A1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A computer implemented method for solving a classical optimization problem of integer factorization implemented on a digital computer system is described. The method is implemented on a classical processor adapted to execute a time evolving block decimation algorithm. The method comprises in a first step an inputting a lattice basis and a target lattice vector to an input device of the classical processor followed by an implementing a lattice basis reduction algorithm on the lattice basis in an implementation module, thereby obtaining a reduced orthogonal lattice basis. The method further comprises a projecting the target lattice vector on the reduced orthogonal lattice basis followed by a building a closest vector to the target lattice vector and optimizing the closest vector using a tropical time-evolving block decimation algorithm by the classical processor and finally outputting an integer vector.