Truck Bed Loading Rails With Height Synchronization Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for loading and unloading cargo from vehicle truck beds lack efficient and automated solutions for easy access, maneuverability, and dumping capabilities, particularly in scenarios requiring precise control and minimal human intervention.

Innovation Solution

A loading/unloading system comprising a power loader assembly with elongated transfer rails and a pivoting application deck/bin that can be selectively operated via controls for rearward advancement, tilting, and dumping, utilizing motors, rollers, and solenoids for automated movement and latching mechanisms to facilitate easy loading and unloading without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual loading and unloading methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and ease of operation deteriorate due to increased manual labor and time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading and unloading efficiencyVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct functional modules: a power loader assembly with movable deck for automated loading, a conveyor system for cargo transfer, and a control system. Each module operates independently but coordinates through the control system, enabling automated high-productivity operation while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with an automated power loader assembly that includes motors, hydraulic systems, and electronic controls. The movable deck is actuated by powered mechanisms rather than manual effort, and the conveyor system uses motorized drive mechanisms, substituting human labor with automated mechanical and electrical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If automated power loader assembly is used, then ease of operation and productivity improve, but device complexity increases due to additional motors, controls, and mechanical components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational convenienceVSAvoidmechanical system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power loader assembly is designed as a multi-functional unit that can perform multiple operations: moving the deck forward and backward, lifting and lowering the deck, and coordinating with the conveyor system. This universal design consolidates multiple functions into a single integrated assembly, improving ease of operation while managing complexity through functional integration rather than separate dedicated mechanisms for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates self-contained control mechanisms where the power loader assembly and conveyor system are automatically coordinated through integrated control systems. The movable deck automatically positions itself and coordinates with the conveyor for loading operations, reducing the need for complex manual coordination and simplifying operation while maintaining automated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If pivoting application deck is used for dumping, then ease of operation improves for cargo unloading, but device complexity increases due to pivoting mechanism and latching systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedumping operation convenienceVSAvoidpivoting and latching mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The application deck is designed with pivoting capability that allows it to dynamically change from a horizontal loading position to a tilted dumping position. This dynamic configuration enables easy cargo unloading by gravity while the pivoting mechanism is integrated into the existing power loader assembly, utilizing the same hydraulic or mechanical actuation systems already present in the movable deck design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pivoting mechanism for the application deck is merged with the power loader assembly's existing actuation systems. The same motors, hydraulic cylinders, or mechanical linkages that move the main deck are used to pivot the application deck, consolidating mechanisms rather than adding separate dedicated systems for dumping functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If latching mechanisms are used for securing cargo, then reliability of cargo securing improves, but device complexity increases due to additional latching components and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo securing reliabilityVSAvoidlatching system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual latching operations are replaced with automated latching mechanisms controlled by the system's electronic control unit. Sensors detect when cargo is properly positioned and automatically activate latching devices to secure the load, providing reliable cargo securing through automated mechanical engagement controlled by electronic signals rather than manual mechanical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3787929B1Truck loading system
Publication Date: 2024.05.01 MASTERHAUL LLC
  • EP3787929B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3787929B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3787929B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A loading/unloading system for an associated truck bed includes first and second laterally spaced rails configured for receipt in the associated truck bed. First and second support leg assemblies are operatively associated with the first and second rails, respectively. First and second motors are received on the first and second leg assemblies, respectively, and are configured to selectively raise and lower the first and second rails. A sensor assembly is mounted on the rails to monitor the position of the first rail relative to the second rail. The sensor assembly is interconnected to the first and second motors for maintaining the rails at the same height relative to one another.