Truck Docking Camera Fusion for Precise Route Localization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for autonomous truck docking at warehouses face challenges in accuracy and reliability due to the limitations of single-source sensors, leading to inefficiencies and safety concerns, especially for novice drivers during peak times.

Innovation Solution

A system that combines data from infrastructure and truck-mounted cameras to create enhanced 3D depth maps for improved obstacle detection, localization, and navigation, using data fusion techniques to enhance perception and distance measurement accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional autonomous docking systems use only vehicle-mounted cameras, then the system complexity is low, but the distance and localization estimation accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance and localization estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines infrastructure cameras mounted at the docking station with vehicle-mounted cameras to create a fused 3D depth map. This merging of multiple camera sources improves distance and localization estimation accuracy by providing multiple viewing angles and reference points, while the infrastructure cameras serve as fixed reference elements that reduce overall system complexity compared to equipping every vehicle with multiple cameras.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If infrastructure cameras are added to improve detection accuracy, then object detection and localization accuracy improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection and localization accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a camera selection module that acts as an intermediary to intelligently select which infrastructure cameras to activate based on the vehicle's current position, route, and docking requirements. This mediator reduces device complexity by not requiring all infrastructure cameras to operate simultaneously, while still achieving high object detection and localization accuracy through selective camera activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts which infrastructure cameras are active based on real-time vehicle position and docking needs. The camera selection is not static but changes as the vehicle moves through different route segments, optimizing the balance between detection accuracy and system complexity by activating only the necessary cameras at each moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If multiple infrastructure cameras are used to create 3D depth maps, then perception and distance measurement accuracy improves, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperception and distance measurement accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting and using only the necessary subset of infrastructure cameras required for each specific route segment and docking maneuver, rather than processing data from all available cameras. This reduces computational load and processing time while maintaining sufficient perception and distance measurement accuracy for the current operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If real-time camera data fusion is implemented, then navigation accuracy improves, but the computational resources and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the docking process into distinct route segments, with each segment having its own selected subset of infrastructure cameras. This segmentation allows the system to process camera data in manageable portions rather than all cameras simultaneously, reducing computational complexity while maintaining navigation accuracy through cumulative processing of segment-specific data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12617426B2Autonomous docking system for freight trucks
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 HITACHI LTD
  • US12617426B2 patent drawing
  • US12617426B2 patent drawing
  • US12617426B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Autonomous docking systems and methods receive asynchronous images from a vehicle-mounted camera and a plurality of infrastructure cameras and perform object mapping to determine candidate routes leading to a docking station. Candidate routes are divided into route segments for which disparity map quality scores are estimated to select a navigation route. Information from infrastructure cameras and vehicle-mounted cameras is used to generate a disparity map to perform object detection, distance measurement, or localization along the navigation route. The disparity map is used to communicate navigation commands to an HMI or a vehicle control system.