Truck Route Optimization System for Fuel-Efficient Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Heavy-duty trucks face challenges in optimizing fuel efficiency and timely delivery due to complex road networks and trade-offs between speed and fuel consumption, leading to increased operational costs and environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining optimal routes and speeds for heavy-duty trucks by modeling road networks as interconnected nodes and edges with associated cost functions, using a heuristic search algorithm to minimize fuel costs while ensuring on-time delivery, incorporating fuel-rate-speed functions and fuel cost calculations to provide efficient route and speed guidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If trucks travel faster to ensure timely delivery, then delivery time is reduced, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery timeVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the speed parameter based on road conditions, truck characteristics, and delivery constraints. By optimizing speed as a variable parameter rather than using fixed speed limits, the system finds the optimal balance between delivery time and fuel consumption for each specific route segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system transitions from static route planning to dynamic optimization. It continuously adapts the route and speed recommendations based on real-time or near-real-time conditions, allowing the system to respond to changing circumstances and optimize the trade-off between time and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If trucks take longer routes to conserve fuel, then fuel consumption is reduced, but delivery time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoiddelivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates multiple route options by changing the route parameter and comparing their respective fuel consumption and time characteristics. It selects the optimal route based on the constrained optimization problem, finding the best compromise between fuel efficiency and delivery timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects among alternative routes based on current conditions and optimization criteria, rather than relying on fixed or predetermined routing rules. This allows flexible adaptation to find the most efficient path that meets delivery constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If optimal routing is calculated in real-time, then route efficiency is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations by pre-processing route options and organizing them in a search structure before final optimization. This preliminary organization of the search space reduces the computational burden during actual route determination, allowing efficient real-time or near-real-time optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The routing problem is segmented into manageable components using a search tree structure, where the route is built step-by-step through sequential decision points. This segmentation allows the complex optimization problem to be solved through a series of simpler sub-problems, reducing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10502578B2Methods and systems for efficient and timely transportation of heavy-duty trucks
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 THE CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
  • US10502578B2 patent drawing
  • US10502578B2 patent drawing
  • US10502578B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Optimal routes and speeds for a heavy-duty truck traversing a network of roads can be automatically determined so as to minimize fuel costs (and optionally other operating costs) while still making on-time delivery of freight to a destination. Route and speed optimization can be based on a network model in which edges correspond to road segments and each edge has an associated cost function that reflects fuel consumption for a truck traversing the corresponding road segment. Given a starting location, destination location, delivery deadline, and truck information, an efficient search algorithm can be executed by a computer to determine an optimal path and speed through the network model, subject to the constraint of arriving at the destination by the delivery deadline. A truck operator can follow the route to the destination, driving at the optimal speed.