Trunk and Drop RFoG Architecture Gain Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical Beat Interference (OBI) and limited return link budget are significant issues in Radio Frequency over Glass (RFoG) networks, leading to signal degradation and reduced upstream and downstream traffic capacity.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a trunk and drop architecture with individual gain control for trunk ports and average gain control for drop ports, along with high-performance low-noise receiver front-ends and EDFAs, to manage and amplify signals effectively, reducing OBI and enhancing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple reverse path transmitters are powered on in RFoG networks, then upstream traffic capacity is improved, but Optical Beat Interference occurs causing signal degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupstream traffic capacityVSAvoidOptical Beat Interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the RFoG network into multiple independent wavelength channels, where each transmitter operates on a distinct wavelength. This segmentation prevents OBI by ensuring that multiple transmitters do not interfere with each other, while still allowing all transmitters to operate simultaneously and maintain high upstream traffic capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces wavelength as an additional dimension for signal differentiation. By assigning different wavelengths to different transmitters, the system transforms the problem from a single-dimension (time-division) approach to a multi-dimensional (wavelength-division) approach, enabling simultaneous operation of multiple transmitters without OBI.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a star splitter distributes light over 32 subscribers, then network coverage is improved, but return link budget is reduced by 15 dB loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverageVSAvoidreturn link budget
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the optical network by using wavelength-division multiplexing and independent gain control for each wavelength channel. This allows the system to maintain the star splitter configuration for broad coverage while compensating for the 15 dB loss through precise gain adjustment at each wavelength, thereby preserving the return link budget.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple upstream inputs are combined in the same wavelength range, then upstream traffic capacity is increased, but optical beat interference overwhelms information content with noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupstream traffic capacityVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the upstream traffic into multiple wavelength channels, with each channel carrying independent data streams. By combining these segmented channels in the wavelength domain rather than the time domain, the system increases overall traffic capacity while preventing OBI-induced noise from overwhelming the information content in each channel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses wavelength-division multiplexing as an intermediary mechanism to combine multiple upstream inputs. Instead of directly combining signals in the same wavelength range (which causes OBI), the system uses wavelength multiplexing to separate and then combine signals in a controlled manner, preserving signal-to-noise ratio while increasing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces OBI, improves signal quality, and increases the capacity of RFoG networks by maintaining precise overall gain and supporting higher data throughput rates, including 40 Gbps download and 10 Gbps upload speeds.

Implementation Method 1

The system utilizes high-performance low-noise receiver front-ends and EDFAs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectErbium-Doped Fiber Amplification:

Data Source

PatentUS10291970B2Trunk and drop RFOG architecture
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
  • US10291970B2 patent drawing
  • US10291970B2 patent drawing
  • US10291970B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an optical system having multiple cascaded splitter/combiners, a trunk port and/or a drop port is configured for at least one of the splitter/combiner units. Drop ports may be configured with an average gain control, and the trunk ports may be configured to have individual gain control to provide a more precise overall gain and to maintain adequate signal levels. Embodiments apply to evolving RFoG architectures designed to serve a large number of subscribers without suffering from OBI (Optical Beat Interference) by retransmitting an optical signal through cascading splitters/combiners.