Truss-Braced Wing Joint Induction Heating for Ice Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ice protection methods for cantilevered wings are inefficient and not feasible for truss-braced wings due to the extended length requiring numerous electric heating mats, increased power consumption, disruption of laminar flow, and limitations in ducting systems, with none addressing ice accumulation at structural joints.

Innovation Solution

An ice protection system for truss-braced wings using a magnetic susceptor at the joint coupled with an induction heating coil to generate eddy currents for joule heating, inhibiting ice accumulation without affecting aerodynamics or laminar flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electric heating mats are used to protect the entire length of the truss-braced wing, then ice protection coverage is improved, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice protection coverageVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies heating elements only at specific critical locations (joints where struts couple to the wing) rather than along the entire wing span. This localized approach maintains ice protection where it is most needed while dramatically reducing the total power consumption compared to heating the entire wing surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The ice protection system is segmented into discrete heating zones at each joint location rather than a continuous heating system along the wing. Each joint can be independently heated, allowing the system to address ice accumulation at critical structural points without the energy cost of heating the entire wing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If electric heating mats are integrated onto the wing surface, then ice protection is achieved, but laminar flow is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice protectionVSAvoidlaminar flow disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Heating elements are placed locally at joints beneath the wing surface rather than as surface-integrated mats. This positioning protects the laminar flow over the wing surface while still providing effective ice protection at the critical joint locations where heating is applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the wing span is extended to increase aspect ratio, then lift-induced drag is reduced, but ice accumulation risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidice accumulation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides targeted ice protection at specific joint locations on the extended wing structure without requiring continuous heating along the entire increased span. This allows the benefits of the extended aspect ratio to be maintained while addressing ice accumulation only at the critical structural joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If conventional heating methods are applied to structural joints, then ice protection at joints is achieved, but aerodynamic performance is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint ice protectionVSAvoidaerodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Heating elements are positioned locally at the joints beneath the wing surface, providing ice protection at the structural joint while maintaining the smooth aerodynamic surface of the wing. This separates the ice protection function at the joint from the aerodynamic surface, allowing both requirements to be satisfied simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively inhibits ice accumulation on truss-braced wings, maintaining aerodynamic efficiency and reducing weight and power consumption compared to conventional methods.

Implementation Method 1

The induction heating coil is configured to generate eddy currents inside the magnetic susceptor based on being driven with an alternating current (AC) excitation current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The induction heating coil is configured to generate eddy currents inside the magnetic susceptor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 3

The eddy currents circulate through the magnetic susceptor causing joule heating of the magnetic susceptor to inhibit ice accumulation on the joint

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12384546B2Ice protection system for a truss-braced wing of an aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 THE BOEING CO
  • US12384546B2 patent drawing
  • US12384546B2 patent drawing
  • US12384546B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A ice protection system for a truss-braced wing of an aircraft is disclosed. The system includes a wing, a support strut, a joint coupling the support strut to the wing to form a structural truss of the truss-braced wing, a magnetic susceptor disposed on or within the joint, and an induction heating coil disposed on or within the truss-braced wing. The induction heating coil is configured to generate eddy currents inside the magnetic susceptor based on being driven with an alternating current (AC) excitation current. The eddy currents circulate through the magnetic susceptor causing joule heating of the magnetic susceptor to inhibit ice accumulation on the joint.