Truss Tube and Polygonal Bar Joints for Robotic Welding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing truss devices require skilled craftsmanship and are time-consuming due to numerous manual welded connections, making them unsuitable for efficient robotization.

Innovation Solution

The truss device features polygonal cross-section bars connected to tube bodies via linear connections, allowing for simplified and automated production using a four-axis motion system, with options for internal welding and use of hollow tubular profiles for weight and cost savings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If manual welded connections are used to connect bars and tube bodies, then the truss device achieves structural strength and stability, but the manufacturing process requires skilled craftsmanship and is time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The connection process is segmented into linear paths that can be independently executed by robotic welding systems. By dividing the complex three-dimensional welding task into sequential linear movements along predefined paths, the manufacturing process becomes automated while maintaining connection quality and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the connection design from curved or complex paths to linear paths. This parameter change enables the use of automated robotic welding systems that move along straight lines, significantly improving manufacturing speed and reducing the need for skilled manual craftsmanship while maintaining adequate connection strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If manual welded connections are used to connect bars and tube bodies, then the truss device achieves structural strength and stability, but the manufacturing process is complex and vulnerable to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into standardized linear connection paths that can be programmed and replicated. This segmentation reduces manufacturing complexity by converting complex manual welding tasks into repeatable automated processes with fewer variables and lower error rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces manual mechanical welding operations with automated robotic welding systems. This substitution eliminates the variability and skill-dependency of manual welding, reducing manufacturing complexity and improving consistency while maintaining the required structural strength through controlled automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If curved bar connections are used to connect tube bodies, then the truss device achieves structural integrity, but the welding process requires six-axis motion systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmotion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adapting the motion system to accommodate curved bar connections, the invention inverts the approach by designing linear bar connections that adapt to the capabilities of simpler four-axis motion systems. This inversion reduces motion system complexity from six axes to four axes while maintaining structural integrity through the linear connection geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameter of bar connections from curved to linear. This parameter change fundamentally simplifies the motion requirements from six-axis to four-axis systems, reducing device complexity while preserving structural integrity through the linear connection paths that can be accurately executed by simpler motion systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Extent of automation

If linear connections are used to connect bars and tube bodies, then the manufacturing process can be robotized with four-axis motion systems, but the connection geometry must be simplified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobotization capabilityVSAvoidconnection geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The invention deliberately changes the geometric parameter of connections from curved to linear to enable robotization. This parameter change simplifies the connection geometry to match the capabilities of four-axis motion systems, achieving full automation while the simplified linear geometry remains sufficient for the structural requirements of the truss device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250376846A1Truss device
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 SIXTY82 BV
  • US20250376846A1 patent drawing
  • US20250376846A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A truss device comprises a set of elongate tube bodies (10) which extend parallel to each other in a longitudinal direction and which are connected spatially separated from each other by bars (30). The tube bodies (10) are provided or at least can be provided at opposite outer ends with coupling means (20) for a releasable coupling to a tube body of a further truss device. The bars (30) have a polygonal cross-section and at their end surfaces are connected substantially along at least one side of a periphery of this cross-section to an adjacent tube body along an at least in projection linear connection.