Trust Heuristic Device for Dynamic Network Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network security systems face challenges in balancing security and accessibility, as stringent security measures can hinder user experience, while the lack of effective trust mechanisms exposes users to cyber threats like phishing and identity theft.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for determining a confidence level associated with a device using heuristics of trust, which involves evaluating communications to identify remote devices, calculating trust heuristics, and assigning access rights based on confidence levels, incorporating cryptographic systems, digital signatures, and secure computing modules to ensure secure and accessible network interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If stringent security measures are implemented, then network security is improved, but user experience and accessibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork securityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts security parameters such as confidence thresholds and access rights based on device behavior analysis. Instead of applying fixed stringent security measures to all devices, the system modifies security parameters adaptively, allowing high-confidence devices to access resources with fewer restrictions while maintaining strong security for low-confidence devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The security system transitions from static access control to dynamic trust-based access control. The evaluating device continuously monitors device behavior, updates confidence levels in real-time, and adjusts access rights dynamically. This allows the system to balance security and accessibility by adapting security measures to the current trustworthiness of each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If anonymous free exchange of information is allowed, then network accessibility is improved, but exposure to cyber threats increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork accessibilityVSAvoidcyber threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluating device acts as an intermediary between remote devices and network resources. It receives communications from anonymous devices, evaluates their trustworthiness based on behavioral heuristics, and mediates access to network resources. This intermediary layer maintains network accessibility for anonymous devices while protecting against cyber threats by filtering and controlling their access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service security evaluation by automatically analyzing device behavior patterns and assigning confidence levels without requiring manual intervention. The evaluating device autonomously monitors communications, calculates trust metrics, and enforces access controls, enabling the network to protect itself from threats while maintaining open accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated trust evaluation is implemented, then security management efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual security management processes with automated computational evaluation. Instead of human administrators manually assessing device trustworthiness, the evaluating device uses cryptographic protocols and heuristic algorithms to automatically calculate confidence levels. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with automated systems improves security management efficiency while the modular architecture helps manage the inherent complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11695783B2Systems, devices, and methods for determining a confidence level associated with a device using heuristics of trust
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 ARES TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11695783B2 patent drawing
  • US11695783B2 patent drawing
  • US11695783B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining a confidence level associated with a device using heuristics of trust includes receiving, by an evaluating device, at least a communication from a first remote device, determining, by the evaluating device, an identity of the first remote device as a function of the at least a communication, calculating, by the evaluating device, at least a heuristic of trust as a function of the at least a communication and the identity, assigning, by the evaluating device, a first confidence level to the first remote device as a function of the at least a heuristic of trust, and assigning, by the evaluating device, an access right as a function of the first confidence level.