Trust Metadata Score Threshold Monitoring for Information Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations and individuals face challenges in determining the trustworthiness of information due to varying levels of trust management across different data sources, leading to uncertainty in consuming information and potential reduction in the overall value of information systems.

Innovation Solution

A trust index repository is utilized to select and monitor trust factors, with identified thresholds and corresponding actions, enabling event notifications when trust metadata scores reach specific thresholds, thereby facilitating informed decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If information consumers assume information can be trusted until problems occur, then information consumption can proceed without interruption, but the reliability of information consumption is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation consumption continuityVSAvoidinformation trustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary trust assessment by calculating trust metadata scores before information consumption occurs. Trust factors are evaluated in advance and stored in a data store, allowing consumers to know the trustworthiness of information before consuming it, rather than assuming trust and dealing with problems later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by providing event notifications to information consumers when trust metadata scores change or when trust levels are updated. This continuous feedback loop allows consumers to make informed decisions about information consumption based on current trust assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If information providers deliver all information without distinction, then information delivery is simplified, but the value of the provider system is reduced due to varying trust levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation delivery simplicityVSAvoidoverall system value
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by calculating and attaching specific trust metadata scores to each information item or data set. Instead of treating all information uniformly, each piece of information receives its own trust assessment based on relevant trust factors, allowing consumers to distinguish between different levels of trustworthiness while maintaining simple delivery mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The trust assessment system segments information evaluation by breaking down trust into multiple discrete trust factors (e.g., data quality, source reliability, timeliness). Each factor can be independently assessed and combined to form an overall trust score, allowing providers to maintain simple delivery while enabling consumers to evaluate specific aspects of information trustworthiness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If trust assessment is performed without systematic thresholds, then flexibility in trust evaluation is maintained, but decision-making complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrust evaluation flexibilityVSAvoiddecision-making complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages complexity by changing parameters through the use of configurable thresholds for trust metadata scores. These thresholds can be adjusted based on specific consumption scenarios, risk tolerances, or business rules, allowing the system to adapt to different requirements without increasing decision-making complexity for end users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8443189B2Trust event notification and actions based on thresholds and associated trust metadata scores
Publication Date: 2013.05.14 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US8443189B2 patent drawing
  • US8443189B2 patent drawing
  • US8443189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is provided for selecting one or more trust factors from trust factors included in a trust index repository. Thresholds are identified corresponding to one or more of the selected trust factors. Actions are identified to perform when the selected trust factors reach the corresponding threshold values. The identified thresholds, identified actions, and selected trust factors are stored in a data store. The selected trust factors are monitored by comparing one or more trust metadata scores with the stored identified thresholds. The stored identified actions that correspond to the selected trust factors are performed when one or more of the trust metadata scores reach the identified thresholds. At least one of the actions includes an event notification that is provided to a trust data consumer.