Confidential Computing for Trusted Multiparty Software Builds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed software integration and build processes face challenges in protecting confidential intellectual property (IP) between mutually distrustful entities, such as OEMs and suppliers, due to security threats like unauthorized access, man-in-the-middle attacks, and exfiltration of secrets during build execution.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a trusted, distributed build process using confidential computing technologies, including hardware-based Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) and remote attestation to ensure that IP is protected during execution, integrity is maintained, and secrets are only released to trusted platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If distributed software integration is implemented between multiple entities, then collaboration and productivity are improved, but security risks and IP protection challenges worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware integration efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity threats to IP
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the build environment into isolated Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) for each entity, allowing collaborative software integration while maintaining security boundaries. Each entity's software modules are compiled and integrated within separate TEEs, preventing unauthorized access to other entities' intellectual property while enabling productive collaboration through controlled interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A key management server acts as an intermediary between entities, managing secret keys and controlling access to build environments. This mediator enables collaborative build processes by selectively providing decryption keys to authorized TEEs based on key release policies, facilitating productivity while maintaining IP protection through centralized security control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If secret keys are stored securely with key release policies, then IP protection is improved, but access control complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIP protection strengthVSAvoidkey management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The key management system implements self-service capabilities where TEEs automatically request and receive decryption keys based on predefined key release policies. The system autonomously evaluates whether build conditions are met and provides keys without manual intervention, maintaining strong IP protection through automated access control while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Key release policies are configured in advance with specific build conditions and requirements. The key management server pre-evaluates these policies and automatically provides keys when conditions are satisfied, eliminating the need for complex real-time decision-making processes and simplifying key management while ensuring reliable IP protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If cryptographic measurements verify build environment integrity, then trust and security are improved, but verification time and process complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuild environment trustVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Cryptographic measurements of the build environment are performed in advance during TEE initialization, before any actual build operations commence. This preliminary verification establishes trust quickly, allowing subsequent build processes to proceed without repeated verification overhead, thus improving reliability while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs rapid cryptographic verification by leveraging hardware-based TEE capabilities that can execute verification instructions in parallel and at high speed. This rushes through the verification process efficiently, providing strong trust assurances without significant time penalties compared to sequential verification methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentEP4610855A1Systems and methods for implementing a trusted multiparty build process using confidential computing
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP4610855A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4610855A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4610855A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B

AI summary

A method for implementing a multi-party software build process using confidential computing includes encrypting, using one or more secret keys, a disk image of software configured to implement the software build process, storing the one or more secret keys and a key release policy that defines one or more conditions for releasing the one or more secret keys to entities associated with the software build process, and, using hardware configured to support operation of a trusted execution environment (TEE), launching a software environment within the TEE and performing a cryptographic measurement of the software environment, selectively providing the one or more secret keys based on validation of the cryptographic measurement of the software environment and the key release policy, and, using the one or more secret keys for decrypting the disk image, verifying integrity of the disk image, and launching the software build process.