Trusted Distance Measurement via Third-Device Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless distance measurement systems are vulnerable to tampering, allowing malicious devices to falsify arrival time data, leading to inaccurate distance calculations and potential abuse of location-based services.

Innovation Solution

A system that involves a third trusted device to verify distance measurements by comparing the arrival times of a measurement message at both the first and third devices, using a verification test to ensure the distances correspond to a viable spatial constellation, thereby protecting against fake time of arrival and time of departure data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single device performs distance measurement using arrival time data, then the measurement process is simple and fast, but the reliability of the measurement is compromised due to potential tampering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of distance measurementVSAvoidcomplexity of measurement system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A third trusted device is introduced as an intermediary to verify distance measurements. The third device receives measurement messages from the second device and independently determines arrival times, then provides verification data to the first device. This intermediary verification mechanism increases reliability without requiring direct complex interaction between all devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by having the third device provide verification data about the measurement message arrival times to the first device. The first device uses this feedback information to assess whether the distance measurement to the second device is reliable, creating a closed-loop verification system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a malicious device tampers with arrival time data to appear closer, then the location-based service can be abused, but the verification test can detect such tampering when a third trusted device is involved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact of malicious tamperingVSAvoidtrustworthiness of distance data
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The third trusted device acts as an independent intermediary that does not trust the second device's self-reported arrival times. Instead, the third device independently measures arrival times and provides verification data, creating a check-and-balance system that detects malicious tampering by the second device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potential harm of malicious tampering into a beneficial verification opportunity. By introducing the third device, any attempt by the second device to fake arrival times creates detectable inconsistencies in the spatial constellation, allowing the system to identify and reject malicious data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If the system uses a third device for verification, then the reliability of distance measurement improves, but the measurement time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of distance measurementVSAvoidtime for distance measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The third device performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing its own arrival time measurements and verification data before the final distance assessment is needed. The verification test can then quickly compare the second device's measurement against the pre-computed third device data, reducing the overall time required for reliable measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the reliability of distance measurements by making it more difficult for malicious devices to tamper with both distance measurements, ensuring accurate location-based services and preventing unauthorized access.

Implementation Method 1

This application is in the field of ranging protocols. These may correspond to what is known as time-of-flight measurements which measure the time it takes for the electromagnetic radiation to travel between the transmitter and the receiver.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

assuming a wireless signal propagated in free air with substantially the speed of light, it takes 3.3 ns for the radiation to cover a distance of a meter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpeed of light:

Data Source

PatentUS12089052B2System for trusted distance measurement
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US12089052B2 patent drawing
  • US12089052B2 patent drawing
  • US12089052B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device is arranged for distance measurement according to a ranging protocol using a measurement message from a second device. Based on a first arrival time of the measurement message a first distance (151) between the first device (110) and the second device (120) is determined. A third device (130) acts as a cooperating device that is located at a trusted distance (150). The cooperating device determines a third arrival time of the same measurement message, and transfers support data to the first device, the support data being based on the third arrival time. The first device obtains a third distance (153) between the third device and the second device using the support data. Then a verification test is performed on the first distance (151), the trusted distance (150) and the third distance (153). The first distance is reliable when said distances correspond to a viable spatial constellation (100) of the devices.