Trusted Node Quantum Key Distribution Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Quantum Key Distribution systems are limited to approximately 60 miles or 100 kilometers due to attenuation in practical media like fiber optics, restricting the distance over which secure quantum key distribution can occur and compromising key security within nodes.

Innovation Solution

A trusted node system for quantum key distribution, comprising a quantum key engine and controller, facilitates key exchanges and encrypted communication through a network of nodes, using quantum channels to extend key distribution distance and ensure secure encryption and decryption without direct access to unencrypted keys by the trusted node controller.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If quantum key distribution is performed over practical media such as fiber optics, then key exchange can occur between transmitter and receiver, but the distribution distance is limited to about 60 miles or 100 kilometers due to attenuation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution distanceVSAvoidattenuation
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the long-distance quantum key distribution path into multiple segments, each handled by a trusted node. Each node performs key exchange with its neighbors over short distances (within 100 km), then combines these segment keys into a final long-distance key. This segmentation allows the overall distribution distance to exceed the limitation of individual fiber optic segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Trusted nodes serve as intermediaries between the quantum transmitter and receiver when they are separated by distances greater than 100 km. Each trusted node acts as a relay that receives quantum keys from one neighbor, processes them through quantum key combination, and forwards the combined key to the next node, enabling key distribution across multiple hops without requiring direct long-distance quantum channel connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the trusted node controller has direct access to quantum keys for directing operations, then the controller can manage key exchange and encryption, but the security of keys inside nodes is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller management capabilityVSAvoidkey security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the quantum key management functions from the trusted node controller and places them in dedicated security modules within each trusted node. The controller retains only high-level directional control (telling nodes what operations to perform) while the actual key handling, storage, and combination operations are performed by separate security modules that have direct access to the quantum keys. This separation ensures the controller cannot compromise key security while maintaining operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Security modules act as intermediaries between the trusted node controller and the quantum keys. The controller issues directives to these security modules, which then execute the key operations (exchange, combination, encryption) without the controller ever directly accessing the unencrypted keys. This intermediary layer preserves both the controller's management capability and the security of the cryptographic material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Length of stationary object

If quantum keys are combined at trusted nodes to extend distribution distance, then the distance limitation is overcome, but the complexity of key management and node coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution distanceVSAvoidnode coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each trusted node is designed with universal, standardized functionality for quantum key exchange, combination, and forwarding. All nodes implement the same security module architecture and communication protocols, allowing them to operate independently yet cooperatively in a chain. This universality simplifies coordination compared to custom-designed nodes, as each node can be deployed as a interchangeable unit in the trusted node chain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Each trusted node autonomously performs quantum key exchange with its neighbors, locally combines the received quantum keys using its security module, and independently forwards the combined key to the next node. The nodes require minimal external coordination beyond initial network setup, as each node self-manages its key operations and maintains its own security module state. This self-service capability reduces the overall system coordination complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11424918B2Method of operation of a trusted node software in a quantum key distribution system
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 QUANTUMXCHANGE INC
  • US11424918B2 patent drawing
  • US11424918B2 patent drawing
  • US11424918B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A trusted node, for quantum key distribution, has a quantum key engine, a quantum key controller and a trusted node controller. The quantum key engine exchanges quantum keys. The quantum key controller directs encryption and decryption. The trusted node controller directs the quantum key controller and the quantum key engine, and has no direct access to keys and data protected by the system, including unencrypted quantum keys.