Trusted Internal Interface for Payment Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current payment devices require remote back-end server processing for interactions between payment applications and value-add applications, leading to inefficiencies and delays in transaction processing.

Innovation Solution

A system and method enabling direct communication and data transfer between payment applications and value-add applications within a payment device, using APIs or interfaces to reduce the need for remote processing, allowing for local data exchange and secure transfer between payment and value-add applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If remote back-end server processing is used for interactions between payment applications and value-add applications, then security and centralized control are maintained, but transaction processing efficiency deteriorates and delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing efficiencyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the payment device into multiple independent application modules (payment application, value-add applications) that can operate autonomously. Each application resides in separate memory areas with defined interfaces, allowing local processing without constant remote server intervention. This segmentation enables efficient local data exchange while maintaining centralized security controls through the payment terminal's secure element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a payment terminal as an intermediary device that hosts multiple applications and facilitates local communication between them. The terminal acts as a mediator that enables direct data exchange between payment and value-add applications without requiring remote server involvement for every interaction, thereby reducing processing time while maintaining security through the terminal's controlled environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple remote data processing operations are required to complete a transaction, then centralized control and security are maintained, but device complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidprocessing operations complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple applications (payment application, loyalty applications, transit applications, etc.) into a single payment device, allowing them to coexist and interact locally. This consolidation reduces the need for multiple separate remote processing operations while maintaining centralized security through the payment terminal's secure element and controlled access mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The payment device is designed with universal functionality to host multiple types of applications simultaneously. The device can perform payment transactions, loyalty program operations, transit fare collection, and other value-added services all within a single platform, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining centralized control through standardized security protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If applications in payment devices are kept independent, then security and modularity are maintained, but data exchange efficiency deteriorates requiring remote processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication independenceVSAvoiddata exchange efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested structure where value-add applications are contained within the payment device alongside the payment application, with each having its own memory space and execution environment. This nesting allows secure independent operation of each application while enabling efficient local data exchange through defined interfaces and shared access to the payment terminal's resources, eliminating the need for remote processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS10685343B2Trusted internal interface
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
  • US10685343B2 patent drawing
  • US10685343B2 patent drawing
  • US10685343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interface and device architecture for a payment device. An interface between a payment application installed in a payment device and one or more value-add applications (such as loyalty programs, transit applications, etc.) that are also installed in the payment device. The API or interface design permits communications and data transfer between the payment application and one or more value-add applications. This reduces (and in some cases may prevent) the need for back-end server processing of data that may be relevant to both a payment transaction and to a function of the value-add application. Similarly, the same or another API or interface may enable communications and data transfer between a value-add application and the payment application.