Trustworthy Component for MRI Control Path Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic resonance apparatuses face challenges in ensuring patient safety due to potential risks from strong gradient fields and radio frequency power levels, especially with implants that can locally concentrate these fields, leading to unintended field strengths within the patient's body.

Innovation Solution

A trustworthy component is introduced into the control path of the magnetic resonance apparatus, which ensures that control information processed in the path has predetermined properties, thereby preventing harmful conditions such as excessive gradient field strengths or radio frequency power levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If functionally safe architectures are implemented with trustworthy control paths, then patient safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient safetyVSAvoidcontrol path architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control path is segmented into a trustworthy control path and a non-trustworthy control path. The trustworthy control path is specifically designed and controlled to ensure functional safety, while other portions can be developed more flexibly. This segmentation allows safety-critical functions to be isolated and verified without requiring the entire system to meet the same stringent requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A formally verified software component acts as an intermediary between the non-trustworthy control path and the safety-critical operations. This intermediary component receives control information, verifies it against safety constraints through formal verification, and only allows safe operations to proceed. This mediator approach enables integration of complex control logic while maintaining safety boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional development processes are used for control paths, then ease of manufacture is improved, but functional safety cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol path implementationVSAvoidfunctional safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Safety constraints and requirements are defined preliminarily before the actual control path development. Formal specifications of safety properties are established in advance, and the trustworthy control path is designed to adhere to these pre-defined constraints. This preliminary definition of safety requirements enables subsequent development to proceed more smoothly while ensuring safety is built-in from the start.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional testing and verification methods are replaced with formal verification techniques. Instead of relying on empirical testing after development, the patent uses mathematical proofs and formal methods to verify that the control path satisfies safety properties by construction. This substitution of verification methodology enables both safety guarantee and easier manufacturing through automated verification tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the control path is made entirely trustworthy, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and development effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol path safetyVSAvoidoverall system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trustworthy properties are applied locally only to the specific portions of the control path that are safety-critical, rather than requiring the entire control path to be trustworthy. The patent identifies and isolates safety-relevant functions and applies formal verification only to those segments. This local application of quality requirements reduces overall system complexity while maintaining necessary safety guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of making the entire control path trustworthy, the patent applies partial trustworthiness only where necessary for safety. The trustworthy control path handles only the safety-critical control information, while other non-critical portions can use conventional development approaches. This partial application of stringent requirements avoids unnecessary complexity in non-essential areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12241951B2Trustworthy component for a control path of a magnetic resonance apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US12241951B2 patent drawing
  • US12241951B2 patent drawing
  • US12241951B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A trustworthy component for a control path of a magnetic resonance apparatus and a magnetic resonance apparatus with at least one trustworthy component are provided. The trustworthy component is configured to be arranged in a control path of a safety-relevant function of a magnetic resonance apparatus, so that when the trustworthy component is arranged in the control path, the control path is, at least in parts, non-trustworthy.