TSN Digital Twin for Dynamic TAS Customization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) systems face challenges in dynamically adjusting their settings to accommodate changing network conditions, such as new applications or congestion, which affects the reliability and predictability of data packet delivery.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of digital twins in TSN networks allows for real-time monitoring and dynamic customization of the Time-Aware Scheduler (TAS) using Reinforcement Learning (RL) models. These digital twins simulate different network states, train RL models, and adjust TAS settings to optimize packet scheduling and prioritize data packets effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If TSN networks use static configurations for Time-Aware Scheduler, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to changing network conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing network conditionsVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin - a virtual copy of the TSN network - to simulate and predict the impact of configuration changes before applying them to the actual network. This allows complex adaptive configurations to be tested and optimized in the virtual environment, reducing the complexity burden on the physical network while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by using the digital twin to pre-calculate and simulate the effects of potential configuration changes before implementing them in the actual TSN network. This allows the network to proactively adapt to changing conditions without requiring complex real-time decision-making in the physical system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If TSN networks implement dynamic customization with digital twins and RL models, then adaptability to changing conditions improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic customization capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The digital twin acts as an intermediary between the complex adaptive system and the physical TSN network. It absorbs the complexity of simulating multiple scenarios and training reinforcement learning models, while presenting simplified configuration recommendations to the actual network. This mediator approach allows dynamic customization capability without directly increasing the complexity of the core network infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If TSN networks adjust settings manually, then control precision is maintained, but productivity decreases due to slower response time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to network changesVSAvoidautomatic adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where the digital twin continuously monitors network conditions and automatically adjusts TSN configurations based on simulated optimal performance. The reinforcement learning models enable the system to autonomously learn from network behavior and make adaptive decisions without manual intervention, significantly improving response speed while maintaining control precision through virtual validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The digital twin provides continuous feedback about the impact of configuration changes on network performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. This feedback loop allows the system to automatically adjust settings in real-time based on actual network conditions, achieving both high productivity and precise control through automated closed-loop optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250141807A1Dynamic customization of time-sensitive networking (TSN) with digital twins
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250141807A1 patent drawing
  • US20250141807A1 patent drawing
  • US20250141807A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method includes accessing at a Time-Aware Scheduler (TAS) of a Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) network a plurality of data packets, where each data packet includes a data packet priority that defines an order for transmitting the plurality of data packets by the TSN network; grouping the plurality of data packets into a cluster according to the data packet priorities, the cluster identifying a first TSN network state; applying a first machine-learning model to the cluster to determine a TAS cycle policy that defines a timing schedule for data packet transmission in the TSN network; and providing the TAS cycle policy to components of the TSN network.