TSV Manufacturing via Dual CMP with Interferometry Endpoint Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 2D and 3D semiconductor packaging technologies face challenges with increased size and performance deterioration due to the need for longer wires and higher power consumption as more devices are integrated, which are addressed by Through-Silicon Vias (TSV) for vertical interconnections, but precise control of planarization processes is lacking.

Innovation Solution

A method for manufacturing TSVs involving a stack structure with interlayer dielectric and metal barrier layers, using chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) with varying polishing rates and endpoints determined by light interferometry or eddy currents to precisely control the removal of layers, ensuring accurate planarization and reducing circuit complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional 2D or 3D packaging technology is used with bonding wires or contact pads to connect integrated devices, then devices can be integrated on the die, but the size of the die would be significantly increased and performance would be deteriorated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integration capabilityVSAvoiddie size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D planar interconnections to 3D vertical interconnections through TSV technology. The opening penetrates through the ILD layer and substrate vertically, enabling devices to be connected in the third dimension (depth) rather than only in the plane, thus reducing the horizontal die area required for interconnections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more devices are integrated on the die using conventional packaging technology, then device integration increases, but the contact distance increases and circuit complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integration capabilityVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By establishing vertical interconnection paths through TSVs, the patent reduces the horizontal distance that signals must travel. Devices stacked vertically can communicate directly through the substrate rather than requiring long horizontal wire routes, thereby simplifying the interconnection topology and reducing circuit complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the interconnection function from the planar bonding wire approach and relocates it to vertical TSV structures. This separation allows the interconnection path to be independently optimized through the substrate thickness rather than being constrained by surface mounting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If more devices are integrated on the die using conventional packaging technology, then device integration increases, but power consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integration capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical TSV interconnections significantly reduce the length of conductive paths compared to horizontal bonding wires. Since power consumption in interconnections is proportional to the square of the wire length (due to RC delay), the shortened vertical paths dramatically reduce power consumption for signal transmission between integrated devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Speed

If TSV is used for vertical interconnections to reduce contact distance and circuit complexity, then device speed should be enhanced, but precise control of planarization processes is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice speedVSAvoidplanarization control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control in the CMP process by monitoring polishing rate and adjusting process parameters accordingly. The system measures the polishing rate in real-time and uses this information to control the polishing endpoint, ensuring precise removal of the metal barrier layer and insulator layer to expose the TSV opening at the correct depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical endpoint detection methods with optical interference measurement. By using light interference patterns to detect the polishing endpoint, the system achieves higher precision than mechanical sensors, enabling accurate control of the planarization process to expose TSVs at the desired depth without damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances the precision and reliability of TSV formation, reducing circuit complexity, increasing device speed, and lowering power consumption by allowing precise control of the planarization process, thereby improving the overall performance and efficiency of semiconductor packaging.

Implementation Method 1

A first planarization process stopping on the barrier layer is conducted to remove a portion of the top metal layer. A second planarization process stopping on the ILD layer is subsequently conducted to remove a portion of the metal barrier layer, a portion of the insulator layer and a portion of the top metal layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical mechanical polishing:

Implementation Method 2

the second planarization process has a polishing endpoint determined by a light interferometry or a motor current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight interferometry: Interference

Implementation Method 3

the second planarization process has a polishing endpoint determined by a light interferometry or a motor current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS8828745B2Method for manufacturing through-silicon via
Publication Date: 2014.09.09 UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US8828745B2 patent drawing
  • US8828745B2 patent drawing
  • US8828745B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for manufacturing TSVs, wherein the method comprises several steps as follows: A stack structure having a substrate and an ILD layer (inter layer dielectric layer) is provided, in which an opening penetrating through the ILD layer and further extending into the substrate is formed. After an insulator layer and a metal barrier layer are formed on the stack structure and the sidewalls of the opening, a top metal layer is then formed on the stack structure to fulfill the opening. A first planarization process stopping on the barrier layer is conducted to remove a portion of the top metal layer. A second planarization process stopping on the ILD layer is subsequently conducted to remove a portion of the metal barrier layer, a portion of the insulator layer and a portion of the top metal layer, wherein the second planarization process has a polishing endpoint determined by a light interferometry or a motor current.