Tub-Type Meltdown Retaining Device for Nuclear Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for managing a core meltdown in nuclear power plants face challenges in effectively capturing and dissipating extreme heat without destroying the facility and releasing radioactive radiation.

Innovation Solution

A trough-like restraining device with a multi-layer lining, including a sacrificial layer for heat absorption and endothermic reactions, a ceramic bonded molded part layer for mechanical stability, and a high thermal conductivity filling layer, positioned below the reactor pressure vessel to absorb and transfer the core melt safely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If a single-layer refractory lining is used in the containment device, then high temperature resistance is achieved, but heat dissipation efficiency is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature resistanceVSAvoidheat dissipation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The containment device is divided into multiple functional layers: an inner sacrificial layer (20-80 cm thick) for heat absorption and endothermic reactions, a middle molded part layer for structural stability, and an outer filling layer with high thermal conductivity for efficient heat dissipation. This segmentation allows each layer to optimize its specific function rather than requiring a single material to fulfill all requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite multi-layer structure combining different materials with complementary properties: the sacrificial layer uses concrete or refractory concrete for heat absorption, the molded part layer uses ceramic-bonded materials for mechanical strength, and the filling layer uses materials with high thermal conductivity for heat transfer. This composite approach resolves the contradiction between temperature resistance and heat dissipation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Temperature

If extreme cooling measures are applied to the core melt, then temperature reduction is achieved, but structural integrity of the containment device is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature reductionVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The sacrificial layer is pre-positioned inside the containment device before the meltdown occurs. This layer is designed to be consumed in advance during the meltdown process, absorbing heat and undergoing endothermic reactions before the core melt reaches the structural molded part layer. This preliminary action protects the structural integrity while achieving temperature reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The sacrificial layer acts as an intermediary between the core melt and the structural containment device. It absorbs the thermal energy and chemical interaction first, preventing direct contact between the extreme heat and the structural molded part layer, thereby maintaining structural integrity while achieving cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Volume of moving object

If the containment device is positioned offset to the side of the pressure vessel, then space for melt distribution is provided, but immediate heat capture capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemelt distribution spaceVSAvoidheat capture capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of positioning the containment device offset to the side as in previous designs, this invention inverts the approach by placing the containment device immediately below the pressure vessel. The pressure vessel protrudes into the retention basin, allowing the core melt to be captured vertically at the point of failure rather than requiring lateral redistribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Temperature

If a thick sacrificial layer is used for heat absorption, then temperature reduction is improved, but device complexity and material consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature reductionVSAvoidlayer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the thickness parameter of the sacrificial layer to be within 20-80 cm, providing a quantitative range that balances heat absorption capability with device complexity. This parameter optimization allows sufficient heat absorption through endothermic reactions while maintaining reasonable structural complexity and material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device efficiently reduces the temperature of the core melt, stabilizes the containment, and facilitates controlled transfer to downstream components, effectively managing the meltdown scenario while minimizing radioactive release.

Implementation Method 1

It is within the meaning of the invention to form the sacrificial layer from a material which not only absorbs stored heat when it comes into contact with a core meltdown, but also leads to endothermic reactions, ie reactions in which additional heat is consumed.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic reaction: Endothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 2

The sacrificial layer absorbs heat from the core melt without extreme cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

This so-called filling layer is created with the help of a monolithic mass, which can consist of a material with high thermal conductivity. In this way, the heat dissipation from the molded part layer in front is promoted or accelerated.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP1902446B1Tub-type meltdown retaining device
Publication Date: 2010.01.13 REFRACTORY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH & CO KG

AI summary

The invention relates to a tub-type meltdown retaining device comprising an outer envelope, the inside of which is provided with a multilayer lining. Said lining encompasses, from the inside out, a monolithic sacrificial layer, a layer made from high temperature-resistant molded parts, and a monolithic filling layer between the envelope and the layer made from molded parts.