Tube Bundle Mixing Device for Low-Pressure Gas Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixing devices for gases in styrene production units fail to achieve uniform distribution and high mixing efficiency at low pressure drops, leading to reduced yield and catalyst aging due to inhomogeneous gas concentration and temperature, and increased energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

A mixing device comprising a bundle of tubes with side holes and directional fins within tubular bodies ensures uniform gas distribution, using a closed casing to maintain pressure and facilitate turbulent mixing within reduced chamber dimensions, eliminating the need for a static mixer and allowing for low-pressure-drop operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional mixing devices with turbulent diffusion and static mixers are used, then mixing homogeneity is improved, but pressure drop increases and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing homogeneityVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The mixing device is segmented into multiple tubes arranged in a bundle, each tube contributing to the overall mixing process. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high mixing homogeneity through the combined effect of multiple parallel mixing channels while maintaining low pressure drop in each individual channel, thus resolving the contradiction between mixing quality and pressure loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each tube in the bundle has side holes positioned at specific locations to create local turbulence and mixing zones. This local quality approach enables effective mixing within each tube while keeping the overall pressure drop low, as each tube operates independently with optimized local mixing characteristics rather than requiring high pressure drop across the entire mixing chamber

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional mixing devices with turbulent diffusion and static mixers are used, then mixing homogeneity is improved, but device complexity and investment costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing homogeneityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device merges the functions of multiple tubes into a single integrated bundle structure, eliminating the need for separate static mixers downstream. The tube bundle itself performs both distribution and mixing functions, simplifying the overall device structure while maintaining high mixing homogeneity, thus resolving the contradiction between mixing quality and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each tube in the bundle serves multiple functions: it distributes the gas stream, creates turbulence through side holes, and contributes to overall mixing. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for additional dedicated mixing components like static mixers, reducing device complexity while maintaining effective mixing performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Volume of stationary object

If mixing chamber volume is reduced, then equipment investment costs are reduced, but mixing homogeneity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing chamber volumeVSAvoidmixing homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from a single large mixing chamber to multiple parallel tube channels, effectively adding a dimensional aspect to the mixing process. This allows the system to achieve high mixing homogeneity within a compact total volume by utilizing the parallel architecture of multiple tubes, thus resolving the contradiction between chamber volume and mixing quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves complete gas mixing with reduced pressure drops, enhancing styrene production yield and selectivity while minimizing energy consumption and equipment costs, making it adaptable to existing plants without space constraints.

Implementation Method 1

The first feeding system of one of the two gases comprises a plurality of fins, inside the first tubular body, which allow a uniform distribution of the feeding gas to the single tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow distribution:

Implementation Method 2

The turbulence (often increased by means of suitable promoters) and the elongated form of the chamber allow the two gases to mix

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent diffusion: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS8303164B2Low-pressure-drop mixing device and use thereof in the mixing of two gases/vapours
Publication Date: 2012.11.06 POLIMERI EUROPA SPA
  • US8303164B2 patent drawing
  • US8303164B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Mixing device for two gases/vapours (hereinafter gases) comprising: a) a plurality of tubes arranged in a bundle (1), each provided, in its initial portion, with a plurality of side holes (5); b) a first feeding system of one of the two gases, comprising a first tubular body (6) situated on the inlet side of the tubes, and c) a second feeding system of the other gas comprising a second tubular body (7) that envelopes in a gas-proof way the tube bundle (1) and at least a portion of the first tubular body (6); characterized in that: d) the first feeding system of one of the gases comprises a plurality of fins (8), inside the first tubular body (6), which allow a uniform distribution of the feeding gas to the single tubes.