Expandable Tube Core for Stringer Layup Without Fiber Bridging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing composite components with thermoforming skins and stringers face issues such as fiber bridging and undulations during layup, adherence of cores to skins, and high costs due to frequent core exchange, leading to inefficiencies in high-rate manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A flexible tubular core with a reinforcement member, expandable to match the shape of the stringer, which withstands layup pressure and is collapsible post-curing, providing support and geometrical definition, and is reusable, suitable for various manufacturing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a semi-rigid core material is used to support the layup process, then the layup process is supported, but the core adheres between stringers and skins causing fiber bridging and undulations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayup process supportVSAvoidfiber continuity and surface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a flexible membrane instead of a semi-rigid core material. This membrane provides the necessary support during layup while being compliant enough to prevent fiber bridging and undulations. The flexible nature allows it to conform to the stringer geometry without creating the adhesion problems associated with rigid cores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible membrane acts as an intermediary between the stringer core and the composite skin. It provides the necessary geometric definition and support during manufacturing while preventing direct adhesion between the core material and the skin, thereby eliminating fiber bridging issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If tube cores are placed inside cavity following 'Lay over the hollow' constraint, then the layup process is simplified, but bridging and undulations of fibers occur during skin layup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayup process simplicityVSAvoidfiber continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible membrane maintains the simplified 'Lay over the hollow' approach while resolving the fiber bridging issue. Its flexibility allows it to accommodate the layup process simplicity while preventing the undulations that occur with rigid tube cores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Strength

If state-of-the-art cores are used, then the core provides structural support, but they adhere between stringers and skins leading to high cost for core exchange

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore structural supportVSAvoidcore reuse cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible membrane provides structural support during the manufacturing process while its non-adhesive properties prevent bonding to the skin. This allows for easier core removal and reuse, improving productivity and reducing costs associated with frequent core exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Manufacturing precision

If a rigid core is used to maintain geometry during curing, then geometrical definition is maintained, but the core cannot be removed or reused efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometrical definitionVSAvoidcore removal and reuse
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane transitions from a rigid-like state during curing (maintaining geometrical definition) to a flexible, removable state afterward. This dynamic behavior allows it to provide the necessary geometric definition during manufacturing while enabling easy removal and reuse for subsequent production cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables waste reduction, lower recurring costs, improved laminate quality, better cycle times, and enhanced demolding capabilities, with potential for automation.

Implementation Method 1

a flexible tube core (10c) configured to be expandable to essentially the same shape as the closed-profile thermoforming stringer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the reinforcement member (10r) is configured to withstand layup pressure over the hollow portion (20h) so that a minimum layup pressure can be realized while keeping geometrical shape of the thermoforming base layer (30)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250367869A1Flexible tube element
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US20250367869A1 patent drawing
  • US20250367869A1 patent drawing
  • US20250367869A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flexible tube element for insertion into a hollow portion enclosed between a first principal surface of a thermoforming base layer and a protruding part of a closed-profile thermoforming stringer, wherein the closed-profile thermoforming stringer has a base part attached to the first principal surface. The flexible tube element includes a flexible tube core configured to be expandable to essentially the same shape as the closed-profile thermoforming stringer; and a reinforcement member disposed only in an area of the flexible tube element that faces the first principal surface of the thermoforming base layer.