Powered Tube Cutter With Composite Rollers for Coated Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutters for thin-wall stainless steel tubes are cumbersome, difficult to operate, and can damage coated tubes due to inadequate friction and strength, necessitating a quick-acting, ergonomic, and efficient cutting solution that protects the tube surface.

Innovation Solution

A powered cutting tool with a base, electric motor, rotatable metal rollers, a threaded feedscrew, and a handle system that adjusts the distance between the cutting wheel and rollers, featuring a torque limiting mechanism and non-metal outer surfaces for rollers and press wheels to enhance friction and strength without damaging coated tubes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If steel rollers are used for cutting, then the cutter can provide sufficient strength, but the surface of coated tubes is damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller strengthVSAvoidsurface damage to coated tubes
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The roller is constructed as a composite structure with a metal core providing strength and a non-metal outer surface (such as rubber or polymer coating) that protects the tube surface. This composite design allows the roller to simultaneously provide the necessary mechanical strength for cutting while preventing damage to coated tube surfaces through the softer outer layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If non-metal rollers are used to protect tube surface, then the surface of coated tubes is protected, but the friction and strength are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface protection of coated tubesVSAvoidroller strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The roller combines a metal core structure that provides the necessary strength and rigidity with a non-metal outer surface layer that provides protection and appropriate friction characteristics. This composite construction resolves the contradiction by allowing each material to contribute its advantageous properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Device complexity

If manual cutters are used, then the device is simple, but operator time and force are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter simplicityVSAvoidwork efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutter is designed with a motorized drive system that automatically rotates the rollers and drives the cutting operation, eliminating the need for manual cranking or force application. The machine performs the cutting work itself once positioned, significantly improving productivity while maintaining operational simplicity through automated functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Strength

If powered cutters are made robust, then they provide sufficient strength, but they become heavy and bulky

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter robustnessVSAvoidcutter weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cutter design optimizes the balance between strength and weight by selecting appropriate material properties and structural parameters. The use of composite rollers with metal cores provides necessary strength with reduced weight compared to solid metal rollers, and the motorized system allows for more compact construction while maintaining cutting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quick, efficient, and safe cutting of multiple tube sizes with reduced operator effort, protecting the tube surface and improving work efficiency by providing sufficient friction and strength while being lightweight and ergonomic.

Implementation Method 1

a feedscrew defining a first end and a second end. The feedscrew includes a threaded region extending at least partially between the first end and the second end. The threaded region of the feedscrew is threadedly engaged with the threaded receiving region of the frame.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

an electric motor. The cutting tool also comprises a plurality of rollers rotatably supported on the base, at least one of which is rotatably powered by the motor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

Each of the support roller and the press wheel include a non-metal outer surface... providing sufficient friction against the surface of coated tubes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12017287B2Cutter for cutting tubular parts
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 RIDGE TOOL CO
  • US12017287B2 patent drawing
  • US12017287B2 patent drawing
  • US12017287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A powered cutting tool for cutting tubular or cylindrical workpieces such as pipe is described. The cutting tool includes a base, an electric motor, a collection of rollers, a frame, a feedscrew, an auto cut wheel system, and a handle for rotating the feedscrew and adjusting the position of the auto cut wheel system relative to the rollers. In certain versions, the cutting tool includes torque-limiting provisions, to limit the amount of torque applied to the feedscrew. In certain versions, the cutting tool includes rollers and press wheels featuring non-metal outer surfaces.