Tube Orientation Control Using Reinforcement Learning in Food Packaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Food packaging machines face challenges with tube twisting due to complex interactions between sub-systems, which conventional PID controllers struggle to address, leading to inefficient operation and increased waste.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that uses a deep reinforcement learning model, incorporating neural networks, to process both local and remote sub-system variables, allowing for precise control of tube orientation by adjusting parameters such as roller tilt, thereby mitigating tube twisting and improving overall system stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional PID controllers are used to manage tube orientation, then the control system remains simple and easy to implement, but the system cannot effectively address complex interactions between sub-systems leading to tube twisting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetube orientation stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent controllers, each responsible for specific sub-systems (tube former, filler, sterilizer, etc.). Each controller processes local sensor data and communicates with others through a distributed architecture, allowing complex control tasks to be divided into manageable segments while maintaining overall system coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-loop PID control to a multi-dimensional control architecture that incorporates spatial distribution of controllers across different sub-systems. This dimensional expansion allows simultaneous monitoring and adjustment of multiple parameters (web tension, roller positions, tube orientation) across the entire packaging line, enabling effective handling of complex interactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the system is divided into independent sub-systems with local PID controllers, then each sub-system can be controlled independently, but the overall system cannot optimize tube orientation considering interactions across sub-systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesub-system independenceVSAvoidtube orientation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

A distributed feedback mechanism is implemented where sensor data from each sub-system (web tension sensors, roller position encoders, tube orientation detectors) is continuously fed back to local controllers. These controllers exchange feedback information with neighboring sub-systems, enabling coordinated adjustments that maintain both sub-system independence and overall tube orientation precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

While maintaining independent sub-system control, the system merges control functions through a distributed control network that combines local PID controllers with inter-sub-system communication. This merging allows the system to optimize tube orientation by coordinating adjustments across multiple sub-systems (tube former, filler, sterilizer) while preserving the operational independence and modularity of each component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If PID controller parameters are manually tuned for different working conditions, then control accuracy can be optimized for specific conditions, but significant manual input and time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidrecalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements self-tuning capabilities where PID parameters are automatically adjusted based on real-time process data and performance feedback. The distributed controllers monitor system behavior and autonomously optimize their control parameters for different working conditions (different packaging materials, product viscosities, production speeds) without requiring manual intervention, thereby maintaining high control accuracy while eliminating recalibration time losses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240067378A1Method and system for controlling tube orientation in a food packaging system
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 TETRA LAVAL HOLDINGS & FINANCE SA
  • US20240067378A1 patent drawing
  • US20240067378A1 patent drawing
  • US20240067378A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus, including computer program products, are described for managing tube orientation in a food packaging machine, wherein the food packaging machine comprises a plurality of sub-systems. One or more variable values are received, which indicate measurements by the food packaging machine of one or more physical parameters in one or more of the sub-systems, the one or more physical parameters affecting tube orientation. One or more control parameter values are determined for one or more of the sub-systems, by processing the received variable values using a reinforcement learning model and a local control model. One or more control parameters of the one or more sub-systems are adjusted in accordance with the determined control parameter values.