Tube Anti-Extraction Case With Internal Retaining Column

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tube extraction prevention devices fail to adequately prevent accidental or intentional removal of intravenous tubes due to patient movement or carelessness, posing a risk of needle dislodgment and potential accidents.

Innovation Solution

A tube anti-extraction device with a case featuring a sidewall with holes and a resistance member that resists tensile forces, attached to the wrist or ankle using a perforated band, preventing the tube from being pulled out, even with strong forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the IV needle is only fixed to the arm with a fixing tape, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of preventing tube extraction is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetube extraction preventionVSAvoidfixing structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fixing structure is divided into two independent parts: a simple fixing tape for initial attachment and a protective case for enhanced security. The case can be attached to the wrist or ankle independently of the tape fixation, creating segmented protection layers that address different aspects of tube security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective case acts as an intermediary barrier between the tube and external forces. When attached to the wrist or ankle near the puncture site, it serves as a mediator that absorbs and distributes tensile forces, preventing direct transmission to the IV needle and catheter connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a protective case is attached to the wrist or ankle near the puncture site, then the reliability of tube retention is improved, but the ease of operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetube retentionVSAvoiddevice application
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The protective case is designed with multi-functionality to address different operational needs. It can be attached to either the wrist or ankle depending on the puncture site location, and works in conjunction with the fixing tape rather than replacing it. This universal design allows flexible application across different clinical scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the tube is allowed to have slack for patient movement, then the ease of operation is improved, but the risk of accidental extraction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient movement freedomVSAvoidaccidental extraction risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The protective case is attached to the wrist or ankle in advance, establishing a fixed reference point near the puncture site before patient movement occurs. This preliminary positioning creates a stable anchor that limits the effective slack length of the tube, preventing excessive movement while still allowing normal range of motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250319248A1Tube Anti-extraction device
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 PAX CO LTD
  • US20250319248A1 patent drawing
  • US20250319248A1 patent drawing
  • US20250319248A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tube anti-extraction device includes a case, a resistance member provided within the case, and a tool for attaching the case near a puncture site. The case includes openable and closable upper and lower half bodies, and a removal-preventing or retaining column is erected inside. A tube that has entered the case through the hole used as an inlet of the case is wound around the column one and a half turns, and exits to the outside through the hole used as an outlet. After the tube is attached, the upper and lower half bodies are closed and coupled by an engaging portion. Even when the tube is extracted from the outside, the tube wound around the column resists this, and the tube is prevented from being extracted or removed and retained by the device.