Tube Sawing Force Profiling for In-Process Dimension Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tube cutting machines face challenges in accurately determining the dimensions of tubes, particularly the diameter and wall thickness, especially when different types of tubes have closely similar dimensions, making it difficult to distinguish between them and detect errors during the sawing process.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes feed position data and sawing force measurements to determine the actual profile of the tube during the cutting process, allowing for the detection of material dimensions and comparison with target profiles to identify deviations within specified tolerances, thereby determining the correct dimensions and material type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional verification methods are used to check tube dimensions, then measurement accuracy can be ensured, but the checking process becomes expensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetube dimension accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing dimension verification during the sawing process itself rather than after cutting. The measurement device captures feed position data and sawing force measurements in real-time during cutting, enabling dimension verification to be integrated into the manufacturing process flow, thus eliminating separate verification steps and reducing overall time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by having the tube cutting machine automatically perform dimension verification using its own operational data (feed position and sawing force measurements). The evaluation device processes this data to determine actual tube dimensions without requiring external measurement equipment or manual inspection, making the verification process self-contained and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If different tube types with similar dimensions are visually inspected, then identification can be performed, but errors in tube type selection cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetube type identification accuracyVSAvoiderror detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces visual inspection with a measurement-based system that uses feed position data and sawing force measurements to objectively determine tube dimensions. This mechanical/electronic measurement system substitutes for human visual inspection, providing accurate dimension data that can reliably identify tube types and detect selection errors even when dimensions are visually similar.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by comparing the determined actual tube dimensions against expected dimension ranges for different tube types. The evaluation device provides feedback on whether the measured dimensions match the intended tube type, enabling detection of identification errors and ensuring correct tube selection throughout the cutting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If detailed dimension checking is performed on all tubes, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using the existing saw blade feed mechanism and sawing force measurement system for dual purposes: both for cutting the tube and for measuring tube dimensions. The feed position data, already necessary for controlling the cutting process, is simultaneously used for dimension verification, eliminating the need for separate dedicated measurement equipment and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation device serves as an intermediary that processes readily available operational data (feed position and sawing force) to extract dimension information. Rather than requiring complex direct measurement apparatus, the system uses this intermediary evaluation layer to transform existing process data into accurate dimension measurements, simplifying the overall measurement system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11099011B2Measurement of material dimensions
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 RATTUNDE
  • US11099011B2 patent drawing
  • US11099011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for determining material dimensions of a longitudinal profiled section (2) during a sawing process, in which a saw blade (3) is advanced, the longitudinal profiled section (2) being machined by said saw blade (3) along a saw groove during this time; advancement position data of said saw blade (3) along the advancement path (s) being determined and, during this sawing operation, additional measurement data being determined from the group of sawing force (Fs) or another variable which corresponds to the sawing force (Fs). The invention is characterised in that an actual profile is determined from the advancement position data and said additional measurement data.