Multi-Candidate Tube Top Circle Detection for IVD Sample Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sample handling mechanisms in in vitro diagnostics (IVD) labs require manual interaction to identify tube characteristics, which is inefficient and prone to errors.

Innovation Solution

An image-based method using multi-candidate selection for tube top circle detection, which involves acquiring images of a tray with multiple tube slots, extracting candidates for each tube, computing consistency scores across images, and selecting the true tube top circle based on the highest consistency score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual interaction is used to identify tube characteristics, then operator judgment can handle complex cases, but efficiency is reduced and errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of tube characteristic identificationVSAvoidefficiency of sample handling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated optical imaging system. Multiple images are captured from different angles and processed through circle detection algorithms to automatically identify tube characteristics, eliminating the need for manual operator intervention while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates multiple digital copies (images) of the tube from different perspectives. These image copies are then analyzed through consistent circle detection methods, allowing the system to reconstruct accurate tube characteristics without physical manipulation of the sample tubes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If single-candidate circle detection is used, then processing is faster, but robustness decreases in challenging cases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidrobustness of tube circle detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple independent stages: image acquisition from multiple angles, individual circle candidate detection in each image, consistency scoring across images, and final selection. This segmentation allows the system to maintain processing efficiency while improving robustness through multi-view verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through consistency scoring, where circle detection results from multiple images are evaluated against each other. Candidates that consistently appear across multiple views receive higher scores, providing feedback that validates detection accuracy and improves reliability in challenging cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple candidates are extracted per image, then detection robustness improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness of tube circle detectionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary circle candidate extraction in each individual image before combining results. By pre-identifying all potential circle candidates in each view and then evaluating their consistency across images, the system reduces the search space and computational burden of the overall detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The problem is extended from two-dimensional single-image analysis to three-dimensional multi-image analysis. By adding the temporal dimension of multiple images captured at different times/angles, the system improves detection robustness through consistency verification while managing complexity through efficient multi-view processing algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If automated image-based detection is implemented, then efficiency increases and manual handling is reduced, but measurement precision must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of tube identificationVSAvoidaccuracy of tube characteristic measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The circle detection system is designed to be universal, handling various tube types, orientations, and imaging conditions through a single consistent algorithmic approach. The multi-candidate, multi-image methodology provides a unified framework that maintains measurement precision across diverse scenarios while enabling automated high-throughput processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12254694B2Image-based tube top circle detection with multiple candidates
Publication Date: 2025.03.18 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC
  • US12254694B2 patent drawing
  • US12254694B2 patent drawing
  • US12254694B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide a method of using image-based tube top circle detection based on multiple candidate selection to localize the tube top circle region in input images. According to embodiments provided herein, the multi-candidate selection enhances the robustness of tube circle detection by making use of multiple views of the same tube to improve the robustness of tube top circle detection. With multiple candidates extracted from images under different viewpoints of the same tube, the multi-candidate selection algorithm selects an optimal combination among the candidates and provides more precise measurement of tube characteristics. This information is invaluable in an IVD environment in which a sample handler is processing the tubes and moving the tubes to analyzers for testing and analysis.