Tubular Stabilizer Bar Grain Control for Higher Flexural Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tubular stabilizers for vehicles have limited service life and variability in performance due to restricted geometric dimensions and forming processes, which affect strength and toughness, limiting their dynamic testing results.

Innovation Solution

A tubular stabilizer with a metal tubular body featuring a torsion spring section, bent legs, and a bending section with a specific grain size distribution and tempering ratio, made from manganese-boron steel, and tempered using electrical resistance heating to enhance rigidity and flexural strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the diameter-to-wall-thickness ratio is increased to achieve weight savings, then the weight of the tubular stabilizer is reduced, but the flexural strength decreases due to higher internal stresses during forming and operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of tubular stabilizerVSAvoidflexural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different microstructure grain sizes at different locations within the tubular stabilizer. The bending section has a finer mean grain size (0.8-1.5 mm) compared to the torsion spring section (1.0-2.0 mm), creating local property optimization. This allows the bending section to have enhanced strength and toughness where it is most needed, while maintaining overall weight efficiency through the high diameter-to-wall-thickness ratio (18-30).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the microstructural parameters by controlling the mean grain size in different sections through specific forming and tempering processes. By adjusting the grain size ratio between 70-90% (bending section relative to torsion spring section), the patent optimizes the balance between strength, toughness, and formability, enabling weight reduction without sacrificing critical strength properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional forming processes are used to manufacture tubular stabilizers, then manufacturing is simplified, but the service life and dynamic performance are limited due to restricted geometric dimensions and formability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the microstructural parameters through controlled grain size distribution and tempering processes. By achieving a specific grain size ratio (70-90%) between bending and torsion spring sections, and controlling the absolute grain size in the bending section to 0.8-1.5 mm, the patent significantly improves service life (up to 1.5 million cycles) while maintaining compatibility with conventional forming and tempering manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the mean grain size in the bending section is optimized relative to the torsion spring section, then the service life and toughness are improved, but the manufacturing process complexity increases due to required tempering control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice lifeVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality optimization by creating distinct microstructural characteristics in different sections of the tubular stabilizer. The bending section is specifically engineered with a finer grain size (0.8-1.5 mm) compared to the torsion spring section (1.0-2.0 mm), achieving localized property enhancement. This local differentiation improves service life while using standard tempering processes rather than requiring entirely new manufacturing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution extends the service life of tubular stabilizers and allows for customizable rigidity and flexural strength, improving performance in dynamic testing and reducing variability in service life results.

Implementation Method 1

the microstructure has a ratio between the mean grain size, in particular after tempering in the bending section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTempering: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 2

tempered using electrical resistance heating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentEP4185479B1Tubular stabilizer bar for a vehicle chassis, and vehicle chassis comprising the tubular stabilizer bar
Publication Date: 2023.10.25 THYSSENKRUPP FEDERN & STABILISATOREN
  • EP4185479B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4185479B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4185479B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a tubular stabilizer bar (1) for a vehicle chassis, produced from a metal tubular body, the tubular stabilizer bar comprising: - a torsion spring portion (2); - two legs (3, 3') bent from the torsion spring portion (2); and - a bend portion (4, 4') between the torsion spring portion (2) and each bent leg (3, 3'), the bend portion having an inside bending radius (IB) and an outside bending radius (OB). The tubular stabilizer bar (1) has a microstructure having grains with a grain size distribution and with an average grain size, the microstructure having a ratio of the average grain size in the bend portion of the inside bending radius (IB) to the average grain size in the torsion spring portion (2) in the range of 70% to 99% or 70% to 90%, preferably in the range of 71% to 79%, more preferably in the range of 72% to 78%, most preferably in the range of 73% to 77%.