Tumor Mutational Burden Adjustment for Low-Coverage Sequencing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining tumor mutational burden (TMB) are inaccurate when tumor fraction and coverage are low, leading to erroneous reporting of TMB levels, which can have significant consequences for cancer treatment decisions.

Innovation Solution

Adjust observed mutational counts based on tumor fraction and coverage to generate sequencing parameters, determine an expected mutational fraction and distribution, and adjust the observed counts to generate an accurate TMB score, considering factors like neoantigens and haplotype-specific mutation clusters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional TMB counting methods are used, then the assay is simple to perform, but the measurement precision deteriorates when tumor fraction and coverage are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassay simplicityVSAvoidTMB measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting the TMB calculation based on tumor fraction and coverage parameters. When tumor fraction or coverage is low, the system modifies the mutation counting approach to compensate for reduced sensitivity, thereby maintaining measurement precision across varying assay conditions without complicating the overall workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where observed TMB values are compared against expected values based on tumor fraction and coverage. This feedback loop allows the system to identify and correct measurement errors, ensuring accurate TMB reporting even when assay sensitivity is reduced due to low tumor fraction or coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If observed TMB is reported without adjustment, then the reporting process is simple, but reliability deteriorates due to erroneous TMB classification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereporting speedVSAvoidTMB classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by comparing observed TMB values against expected values derived from tumor fraction and coverage data. This allows the system to automatically adjust and reclassify TMB results, ensuring reliable TMB-High or TMB-Low classification while maintaining efficient reporting throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating expected TMB values based on tumor fraction and coverage before final reporting. This preliminary adjustment ensures that TMB results are accurately classified from the outset, preventing erroneous TMB-Low reports for samples that should be TMB-High, thereby improving reliability without significantly impacting reporting speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If TMB adjustment methods are implemented, then measurement precision improves for low tumor fraction samples, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTMB measurement accuracyVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages complexity by implementing parameter-based adjustments rather than fundamentally changing the assay methodology. The TMB calculation framework is extended with adjustment parameters for tumor fraction and coverage, allowing precise measurements without requiring complex new instrumentation or methodologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary computational framework that mediates between the raw sequencing data and the final TMB report. This intermediary layer processes the adjustment calculations based on tumor fraction and coverage, absorbing the complexity of accurate measurement while presenting simple, reliable TMB results to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250250644A1Methods and systems for adjusting tumor mutational burden by tumor fraction and coverage
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 GUARDANT HEALTH INC
  • US20250250644A1 patent drawing
  • US20250250644A1 patent drawing
  • US20250250644A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods for detecting tumor mutational burden (TMB) in subjects. In one aspect, the methods include determining observed mutational counts from sequence information obtained from nucleic acids in samples from the subjects and determining a tumor fraction and/or a coverage of the nucleic acids to generate sequencing parameters. The methods also include determining an expected mutational fraction and/or an expected distribution of the expected mutational fraction given the sequencing parameters to generate an expected result, and adjusting the observed mutational count given the expected result to generate an adjusted result, thereby detecting the TMB in the subject. Other aspects are directed to methods of selecting customized therapies for treating cancer in subjects, and methods of treating cancer in subjects. Yet other aspects include related systems and computer readable media used to detect TMB in subjects.