Tumor Feature Quantification via Moving Variance Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ultrasonic imaging technologies for tumor diagnosis rely heavily on subjective human input for tumor contour identification, leading to inconsistent and unreliable diagnoses due to the reliance on manual input and the blurriness of tumor margins, which affects the accuracy of feature identification such as calcifications, cysts, and heterogeneities.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based method that processes gray-scale ultrasonic images to objectively quantify and image tumor features like margins, cysts, calcifications, and heterogeneities by retrieving tumor contours, calculating gradient values, and defining threshold ranges to identify and display these features, providing a more reliable diagnostic tool.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual tumor contour identification is used by doctors, then the diagnosis process is simple and quick, but the reliability and consistency of diagnosis deteriorate due to subjective variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of diagnosis processVSAvoidconsistency of tumor contour identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-identification of tumor contours through image processing algorithms. The computer automatically retrieves tumor contours from ultrasonic images without requiring manual intervention, thereby eliminating subjective variability while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of contour drawing by doctors is replaced with an automated image processing system. The computer uses algorithms to automatically identify and retrieve tumor contours from ultrasonic images, substituting human subjective judgment with objective computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If snake algorithms are used for automatic contour identification, then objectivity is improved, but the accuracy deteriorates when tumor margins are blurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity of contour identificationVSAvoidaccuracy of tumor contour retrieval
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for contour identification by incorporating multiple image processing techniques beyond simple gradient-based methods. It uses region-based segmentation, texture analysis, and multiple thresholding strategies to accurately identify contours even when margins are blurred, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining objectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If quantitative analysis of tumor features is implemented, then diagnostic reliability is improved, but the complexity of the diagnosis process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of tumor feature identificationVSAvoidcomplexity of diagnosis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by integrating multiple diagnostic capabilities into a single platform. It simultaneously performs contour retrieval, cyst identification, calcification detection, and heterogeneity analysis, thereby improving diagnostic reliability without proportionally increasing system complexity through unified processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex diagnostic process is segmented into distinct modular components: contour retrieval module, cyst detection module, calcification detection module, and heterogeneity analysis module. Each module handles a specific task independently, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while providing comprehensive quantitative analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2357612B1Method for quantifying and imaging features of a tumor
Publication Date: 2018.06.13 AMCAD BIOMED CORP
  • EP2357612B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2357612B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2357612B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A quantification method and an imaging method are disclosed, capable of quantifying the margin feature, the cysts feature, the calcifications feature, the echoic feature and the heterogenesis feature of a tumor, and capable of imaging the margin feature, the cysts feature, the calcifications feature and the heterogenesis feature of a tumor. The quantification method and the imaging method calculate the moving variance of the gray scale of each of the pixel points based on the gradient value of the gray scale of these pixel points. Then, depending on the purpose of the quantification method or the imaging method, the maximum value, the minimum value, the mean value, and the standard deviation of the moving variance of the gray scale of these pixel points are calculated, respectively. At final, with the definition of the threshold value and the imaging rule, the above features of the tumor are quantified or imaged.