Tumor Strain Imaging for Non-Invasive IFP and IFV Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assessing interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and velocity (IFV) inside tumors are unreliable, expensive, and invasive, lacking non-invasive tools to monitor spatial and temporal distributions effectively.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing strain data from tumors obtained through imaging methods like ultrasound elastography, combined with analytical models, to estimate IFP and IFV non-invasively, providing cost-effective and portable tools for clinical applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If contrast-based MRI and optical methods are used to measure IFP/IFV, then measurement capability is provided, but reliability deteriorates and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIFP/IFV measurement reliabilityVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces contrast-based MRI and optical methods with ultrasound elastography, which uses mechanical strain data and analytical models to estimate IFP and IFV. This substitution eliminates the need for imaging contrast agents and provides more reliable, non-invasive measurements without requiring expensive imaging equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a cost-effective ultrasound elastography system with portable equipment, replacing expensive MRI and optical imaging systems. The method uses disposable strain data acquisition and computational models rather than requiring costly contrast agents and sophisticated imaging hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Measurement precision

If contrast-based MRI and optical methods are used, then measurement capability is provided, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIFP/IFV measurement capabilityVSAvoidimaging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex contrast-based MRI and optical imaging systems with a simpler ultrasound elastography system that measures mechanical strain and uses analytical models to derive IFP and IFV. This reduces device complexity while maintaining measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential measurement function from complex imaging systems by using strain data and analytical models to calculate IFP and IFV directly, eliminating the need for contrast agents and sophisticated imaging hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If invasive methods are used to assess tumor parameters, then measurement accuracy is improved, but patient safety deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor parameter measurement accuracyVSAvoidinvasiveness to patient
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces invasive measurement methods with non-invasive ultrasound elastography, which measures mechanical strain externally and uses analytical models to estimate internal tumor parameters. This maintains measurement accuracy while eliminating the harmful effects of invasiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces strain data and analytical models as intermediaries between external measurements and internal tumor parameters, enabling accurate assessment without direct invasive access to the tumor interior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If reliable noninvasive methods are developed, then patient safety is improved, but measurement reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvasiveness levelVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses ultrasound elastography with analytical models to achieve non-invasive measurement of IFP and IFV. The method validates measurement reliability through systematic comparisons with ground truth data, demonstrating that non-invasive strain-based measurements can be as reliable as invasive methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables non-invasive, low-cost, and safe estimation of tumor parameters, including IFP and IFV, facilitating personalized cancer treatments and drug delivery monitoring.

Implementation Method 1

obtain strain data of the tumor from image data of the tumor acquired by an imaging system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasound elastography: Ultrasound

Data Source

PatentUS12539104B2Non-invasive assessment of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), interstitial fluid velocity (IFV) and fluid flow inside tumors
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
  • US12539104B2 patent drawing
  • US12539104B2 patent drawing
  • US12539104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides a method, a system, an apparatus, and a computer program product for determining IFP, IFV, and fluid flow inside tumors. In one example, a method for estimating tumor parameters is disclosed. This method includes: (1) receiving image data from a tumor, (2) obtaining strain data of the tumor from the image data, and (3) determining a tumor parameter, such as IFP and IFV, employing the strain data and an analytical model. Additional tumor parameters can be determined employing the strain data and other analytical models. The additional tumor parameters include compression-induced fluid pressure, velocity and flow inside the tumor, parameter α employing the fluid pressure, the ratio between vascular permeability and interstitial permeability, and the ratio of peak IFP and effective vascular pressure. Each of these parameters can be employed for analyzing, monitoring, treating, testing, etc., tumors or the effects of drugs on the tumors.