Non-Invasive Tumor Tracking via Iterative X-Ray Reconstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cancer radiation therapy is hindered by unpredictable tumor motion during treatment due to patient motion, requiring invasive marker implantation and resulting in sub-optimal radiation delivery, especially for lung tumors with large respiratory motion ranges, where existing markerless tracking methods face challenges with tumor visibility and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A method for real-time tracking of tumors using a few spatially distributed X-ray projections, incorporating a prior image and iterative reconstruction techniques to reconstruct the target's motion phases, allowing for accurate localization without invasive markers, utilizing 4D cone beam CT and respiratory motion sensors to track tumor movement within the body.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If invasive marker implantation is used to track tumor motion, then tumor localization accuracy is improved, but patient trauma and treatment complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor localization accuracyVSAvoidpatient trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the tracking function from invasive markers and implements it through non-invasive X-ray imaging of the tumor itself. The tumor's natural radiopacity is utilized for tracking without requiring foreign objects, thereby eliminating patient trauma while maintaining localization accuracy through image processing and motion analysis techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces X-ray imaging as an intermediary between the tumor and the tracking system. Instead of directly attaching markers to the tumor, the system uses X-ray projections to capture tumor position indirectly, processing these images to extract motion information. This intermediary approach eliminates the need for invasive intervention while enabling continuous tracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If existing markerless tracking methods are used, then patient trauma is reduced, but tumor visibility and tracking accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient traumaVSAvoidtumor tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by acquiring multiple X-ray projections at different angles and time points before attempting tumor localization. These pre-acquired images are processed to create a comprehensive dataset that enhances tumor visibility and enables accurate tracking without requiring invasive markers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from 2D X-ray projections to 3D tumor localization by processing multiple projections taken at different angles. This dimensional transformation allows the system to reconstruct tumor position in three-dimensional space, significantly improving tracking accuracy while maintaining non-invasive operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If standard X-ray imaging is used for tumor tracking, then equipment complexity is reduced, but tracking precision and real-time capability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment complexityVSAvoidtracking precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous X-ray imaging during treatment delivery, acquiring multiple projections in rapid succession. This continuous imaging approach provides real-time tumor position data throughout the treatment process, enabling dynamic tracking without requiring complex specialized equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical tracking systems with an imaging-based approach. Instead of using mechanical sensors or markers attached to the tumor, the system uses X-ray imaging combined with computational methods to track tumor motion, thereby reducing equipment complexity while maintaining or improving tracking precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables non-invasive, robust, and accurate real-time tumor tracking with reduced radiation dose, improving tumor localization accuracy to within 2 mm, and is applicable to lung cancer radiotherapy, addressing the limitations of existing markerless tracking methods by enhancing tumor visibility and tracking accuracy even in challenging anatomical conditions.

Implementation Method 1

acquiring a few spatially distributed x-ray projections of the target area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

performing an iterative reconstruction of the image for each of the motion phases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTomography: Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS11040220B2Method and system for in situ targeting of objects
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 LEO CANCER CARE INC
  • US11040220B2 patent drawing
  • US11040220B2 patent drawing
  • US11040220B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for tracking a target located within a body, whilst scanning the body using X-ray projections, the method including the steps of: (a) providing a first prior image of the body and target indicating their relative position; (b) iteratively performing, for a series of time intervals, the steps of: (i) acquiring a few spatially distributed x-ray projections of the target area; (ii) determining one of a series of motion phases for each x-ray projection; (iii) performing an iterative reconstruction of the image for each of the motion phases; and (iv) outputting a resultant image for a current time interval.