Helmholtz Sound Absorber with Tunable Duct Resonance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sound absorbers using Helmholtz resonators have fixed sound frequencies, requiring replacement to change absorbed sound frequencies, leading to increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A sound absorber design featuring a duct member, base member with a concave portion, and cover member forming a resonance space with dimensions that determine a specific resonance frequency, allowing for easy adjustment of sound absorption by modifying the duct member's length and cross-sectional area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a Helmholtz resonator is used as a sound absorber, then sound absorption at a specific frequency is achieved, but the sound frequency that is absorbed is fixed and cannot be changed without replacing the sound absorber

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability of absorbed sound frequencyVSAvoidcomplexity of changing sound absorber specifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sound absorber is divided into separate components: a resonance chamber and a resonant element (duct member). This segmentation allows the resonant element to be independently adjusted or replaced to change the absorbed sound frequency without replacing the entire sound absorber structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces adjustability to the resonant element dimensions (length and cross-sectional area), allowing dynamic adjustment of the resonance frequency. This enables the sound absorber to adapt to different frequency requirements by modifying the resonant element parameters while keeping the resonance chamber constant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the sound absorber is replaced to change the absorbed sound frequency, then the sound frequency can be changed, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to change absorbed sound frequencyVSAvoidcost of sound absorber replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the sound absorber into a permanent resonance chamber and an adjustable resonant element, the invention allows frequency adjustment by replacing only the resonant element rather than the entire sound absorber, thereby reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention enables frequency adjustment by changing the physical parameters (length and cross-sectional area) of the resonant element. This parameter-based adjustment approach allows cost-effective frequency changes without requiring complete replacement of the sound absorber assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional silencing technologies are used, then noise suppression is achieved, but the sound frequency that is absorbed is fixed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise suppression capabilityVSAvoidflexibility in targeting different sound frequencies
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces dynamic adjustability to the resonant element dimensions, allowing the noise suppression frequency to be adjusted. This enables the sound absorber to target different sound frequencies as needed while maintaining effective noise suppression capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By enabling changes in the resonant element parameters (length and cross-sectional area), the invention allows the noise suppression frequency to be adjusted. This parameter variability provides flexibility in targeting different sound frequencies generated by image forming apparatus operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables cost-effective change of absorbed sound frequencies without replacing large parts, effectively silencing noise in image forming apparatuses by selecting appropriate duct members for different noise frequencies.

Implementation Method 1

Conventional silencing technologies are proposed, in which, to suppress noise having a specific frequency, a technology employing a Helmholtz resonator as a sound absorber is provided.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHelmholtz resonance: Helmholtz Resonance

Implementation Method 2

The sound absorber has a resonance frequency fH determined by fH=(c/2π)·(SH/(V·LH))1/2 and absorbs sound having the resonance frequency fH

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS20150110517A1Sound absorber and image forming apparatus incorporating same
Publication Date: 2015.04.23 RICOH CO LTD
  • US20150110517A1 patent drawing
  • US20150110517A1 patent drawing
  • US20150110517A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A sound absorber includes a duct member constituting a resonance pathway, the duct member including a pathway portion communicating ends of the duct member; a base member including a concave portion; and a cover member including a neck in which to insert the duct member. The cover member covers the concave portion of the base member, and the cover member combined with the base member forms a resonance space having a volume V The resonance pathway has dimensions of a length LH and a cross-sectional area SH and communicates the resonance space and an exterior of the sound absorber. The sound absorber has a resonance frequency fH determined by fH=(c/2π)·(SH/V·LH)1/2 and absorbs sound having the resonance frequency fH, where c represents sound velocity.