Tunable Protein Nanoscaffold Assembly via Inducible Promoters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for forming protein nanoscaffolds in vivo face challenges such as identifying scaffold structures at sufficient resolution, controlling assembly and dynamics, and organizing cellular functions predictably, particularly due to high-expression promoters that harm cell physiology and complicate proper assembly analysis.

Innovation Solution

The development of fusion proteins with a pfam00936 domain linked to synthetic zipper domains via flexible peptide linkers, along with tunable expression systems, allows for precise control over scaffold and cargo protein expression, enabling optimal assembly and imaging of protein-based scaffolds within cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-expression promoters are used to form protein nanoscaffolds, then scaffold assembly is achieved, but cell physiology is harmed and cell death is promoted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescaffold assembly efficiencyVSAvoidcell physiology harm
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using tunable promoters that allow precise control of protein expression levels. Instead of using high-expression promoters that cause cellular harm, the invention employs promoters with adjustable expression strength, enabling scaffold assembly at optimal expression levels that do not deform cell morphology or inhibit division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics through inducible promoters that allow temporal control of scaffold protein expression. The expression can be turned on and off at specific times, enabling researchers to control when scaffolds assemble and disassemble, thereby avoiding continuous high-expression toxicity while maintaining assembly capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If high-expression promoters are used, then scaffold formation occurs, but assembly analysis is complicated due to leaky expression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescaffold formation rateVSAvoidassembly analysis precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Inducible promoters provide temporal control, allowing the system to transition from a non-expressing state to an expressing state only when desired. This eliminates leaky expression that occurs with high-expression promoters, enabling precise analysis of assembly initiation and progression without background noise from premature or constitutive expression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing the inducible expression system in advance, allowing researchers to control exactly when expression begins. This enables synchronized assembly initiation across cell populations and precise temporal resolution of assembly events, which is critical for mechanistic studies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If scaffold proteins are overexpressed, then nanoscaffolds are formed, but cell division is inhibited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoscaffold formationVSAvoidcell division capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action through inducible promoters that allow scaffold protein expression to be activated only during specific time windows. By controlling the duration and timing of expression, the system can form nanoscaffolds temporarily without continuously inhibiting cell division, allowing cells to resume normal division cycles after induction is removed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The tunable promoter system allows adjustment of expression parameters (strength, duration, timing) to optimize the balance between nanoscaffold formation and cell health. By fine-tuning these parameters, sufficient scaffold assembly can be achieved while minimizing the inhibitory effect on cell division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If tunable promoters are used for scaffold expression, then cellular burden is reduced, but expression control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecellular burdenVSAvoidexpression control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses inducible promoters as intermediaries between the researcher's control signal and the protein expression machinery. These promoters respond to specific inducers (chemical or environmental signals), providing a simple external control mechanism that reduces cellular burden by expressing proteins only when needed, while the complexity of control is externalized to the inducer system rather than the cell itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise in vivo formation and imaging of protein scaffold structures, improving the assembly and dynamics of nanoscaffolds, reducing cellular burden, and promoting predictable cellular organization, thus enhancing bioproduct yields and biotechnological applications.

Implementation Method 1

identifying the structures of in vivo protein scaffolds at sufficient resolution; controlling the assembly, dynamics, and positioning of scaffolds inside cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-assembly: Self-Assembly

Implementation Method 2

fusion proteins that can include (a) a pfam00936 domain (ScaF) linked to a first synthetic zipper domain via a flexible peptide linker; or (b) a cargo protein linked to a second synthetic zipper domain via a flexible linker

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProtein-protein interaction:

Data Source

PatentUS12054520B2Control of and imaging techniques for protein nanoscaffolds
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OPERATING MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
  • US12054520B2 patent drawing
  • US12054520B2 patent drawing
  • US12054520B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are constructs, compositions and methods for precise in vivo imaging of the structures and dynamics of protein-based scaffolds with and without their designated cargos.