Tuner Resource Management for Multi-Stream QAM Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital cable systems are not fully utilizing their potential for delivering multiple channels over a single RF QAM due to legacy analog systems, requiring multiple tuners for each channel, which increases costs for both consumers and network operators and relies on proprietary control mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A network resource management apparatus and method that manages multiple tuner resources within premises devices, allowing for efficient distribution of multiple program streams over a single QAM by reserving and directing tuner resources based on availability and content routing tables, independent of proprietary control architectures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple tuners are used to receive and distribute multiple channel streams simultaneously, then the ability to deliver multiple channels over a single QAM is improved, but the hardware complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to deliver multiple channelsVSAvoidnumber of tuners required
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single tuner is designed to perform multiple functions by sequentially tuning to different frequencies and receiving multiple program streams. The tuner resource is shared across multiple applications through time-multiplexed operation, allowing one physical tuner to replace what would traditionally require multiple dedicated tuners for simultaneous channel reception and distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically manages tuner resource allocation and stream distribution without requiring manual intervention. The premises device autonomously tunes to specified frequencies, receives multiple program streams, and distributes them to appropriate output interfaces based on configured routing rules, eliminating the need for manual tuner assignment and stream management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple tuners are deployed in premises devices, then channel reception capability is improved, but capital costs for consumers and network operators increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel reception capabilityVSAvoidcapital costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple tuner functions are merged into a single physical tuner resource. The system combines the reception capabilities that would traditionally require separate tuner hardware into one shared tuner, which sequentially accesses multiple frequencies and program streams, thereby reducing the quantity of hardware components and associated capital costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the single tuner by dynamically adjusting its tuning frequency and reception timing to access multiple program streams. By varying the frequency parameter over time and using statistical multiplexing, the single tuner achieves the functional equivalent of multiple simultaneous tuners without the associated hardware cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If proprietary control mechanisms are used for tuner management, then system functionality is maintained, but operational flexibility and interoperability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control architecture is segmented into distinct functional modules: tuner resource management, program stream reception, and distribution routing. This modular approach allows each component to operate independently with standardized interfaces, reducing dependency on proprietary control mechanisms and enabling greater operational flexibility and interoperability while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that manages tuner resource allocation and stream distribution, decoupling the tuner hardware from application-specific control logic. This intermediary management layer provides standardized interfaces and abstraction, allowing different applications to access tuner resources without requiring proprietary control mechanisms, thereby enhancing operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9743142B2Multi-stream premises apparatus and methods for use in a content delivery network
Publication Date: 2017.08.22 TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC
  • US9743142B2 patent drawing
  • US9743142B2 patent drawing
  • US9743142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for enhanced tuner efficiency, wherein tuner resources function to permit multiple content streams to be demultiplexed and thus made available for subsequent display. In one embodiment, Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) comprises a resource manager on which a guide application is run to control the tuning of an available tuner resource. This approach obviate reliance on OCAP or other proprietary vendor architecture applications. In another variant, the CPE is adapted to receive RF source data from a wideband tuner, or multiple tuners. The CPE may also be utilized in conjunction with other system configurations designed to enforce a security or other policies within a premises network. The CPE may also employ ‘look ahead’ capabilities to anticipate a QAM stream content before it is received.