Tungsten Pullback Etch for Silicon Nitride-Safe MOL Fill

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tungsten pullback methods in semiconductor manufacturing, particularly in middle-of-line (MOL) integration, are limited by the use of high resistive nitridation layers and bottom anti-reflective coatings (BARC), which hinder scaling of small critical dimension structures and can damage underlying silicon nitride layers during dry etching.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a metal cap layer deposition, followed by a polymer fill process using a flowable polymer layer, and a two-step etch process with molybdenum hexafluoride and chlorine/nitrogen trifluoride plasma for selective tungsten cap layer removal, along with a polymer removal and pre-clean process to enable void-free metal fill in features with small critical dimensions without damaging dielectric layers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a dry etch method is used for tungsten pullback, then etching speed and precision are improved, but underlying silicon nitride layers are damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching speedVSAvoiddamage to silicon nitride layer
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A polymer layer is introduced as an intermediary protective barrier between the dry etch process and the silicon nitride layer. The polymer layer is selectively removed after tungsten removal, allowing the dry etch to proceed at high speed without damaging the underlying silicon nitride structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The etch selectivity is optimized by adjusting process parameters (gas composition, power, pressure) to achieve differential etching rates between tungsten and silicon nitride, enabling selective tungsten removal while preserving the dielectric layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If high resistive nitridation layers and BARC are used in conventional tungsten pullback, then tungsten cap layer removal is achieved, but scaling of MOL structures is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetungsten cap layer removalVSAvoidcritical dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful nitridation layer and BARC steps are extracted and removed from the process flow. The invention achieves tungsten pullback using only a polymer layer and selective dry etching, eliminating the scaling limitations imposed by thick nitridation layers and BARC processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The process is simplified by changing the fundamental approach from chemical nitridation-based removal to polymer-based protective layer removal, enabling better control over critical dimensions and supporting continued scaling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the selective removal of tungsten cap layers over dielectric layers without damaging them, enabling efficient metal fill in small critical dimension features with improved scalability and reduced risk of damage to underlying layers.

Implementation Method 1

a first etch process including a chemical etch process using molybdenum hexafluoride (MoF6) to remove the metal cap layer selectively to the dielectric layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical etching:

Implementation Method 2

a first etch process including a dry etch process using chlorine (Cl2) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) plasma

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma dry etching: Plasma

Implementation Method 3

a second etch process including a dry etch process using chlorine (Cl2) only

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma dry etching: Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS20240371654A1Silicon nitride damage-free dry etch method for tungsten removal in middle of line bottom-up tungsten integration
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US20240371654A1 patent drawing
  • US20240371654A1 patent drawing
  • US20240371654A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of filling a feature in a semiconductor structure with metal includes depositing a metal cap layer on a bottom surface of a feature formed within a dielectric layer and top surfaces of the dielectric layer, partially filling the feature from the bottom surface with a flowable polymer layer, performing a metal pullback process to remove the metal cap layer on the top surfaces of the dielectric layer selectively to the dielectric layer, wherein the metal pullback process includes a first etch process including a chemical etch process using molybdenum hexafluoride (MoF6) to remove the metal cap layer selectively to the dielectric layer, and a second etch process to remove residues on etched surfaces of the dielectric layer, removing the flowable polymer layer, pre-cleaning a surface of the metal cap layer, and filling the feature from the surface of the metal cap layer with metal fill material.