Turbidity-Based Sample Adequacy Measurement System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining sample adequacy in clinical diagnostics lack efficiency and accuracy, leading to potential misrepresentation of test results and unnecessary resource expenditure due to inadequate sample quality, particularly in HPV testing.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing turbidity light scattering techniques to assess sample adequacy through a sample assurance reader that measures turbidity, compares it against specified criteria, and provides an adequacy result, allowing for the discontinuation of inadequate samples and ensuring representative test results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional sample adequacy determination methods are used, then the testing process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of test results deteriorate due to inadequate sample quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample adequacy determination accuracyVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing process is divided into two independent stages: (1) sample adequacy assessment using turbidity measurement, and (2) primary testing. This segmentation allows the adequacy determination to be performed separately using a simple turbidity meter, preventing inadequate samples from entering the main testing workflow and improving overall result reliability without significantly complicating the primary testing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A turbidity measurement system serves as an intermediary assessment tool between sample collection and primary testing. This intermediary step provides objective quantitative data about sample adequacy, enabling informed decisions about whether to proceed with testing. The turbidity meter acts as a gatekeeper that filters out inadequate samples before they consume testing resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If all samples are tested without adequacy verification, then the processing speed is high, but resource wastage increases due to testing inadequate samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource wastageVSAvoidtesting throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Sample adequacy assessment is performed as a preliminary action before committing resources to primary testing. By measuring turbidity and comparing it against established criteria, the system identifies and excludes inadequate samples in advance, preventing wastage of reagents, equipment time, and labor on samples that would yield uninformative results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by measuring turbidity, comparing the measurement against predetermined adequacy criteria, and using this feedback to determine whether to proceed with testing. This closed-loop approach ensures that only samples meeting the adequacy threshold undergo primary testing, optimizing resource allocation while maintaining high productivity for adequate samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If sample adequacy is not determined beforehand, then the testing process is straightforward, but the reliability of negative results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenegative result reliabilityVSAvoidtesting procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing procedure is segmented into distinct phases: adequacy assessment followed by conditional primary testing. This segmentation clearly delineates when reliability can be assured (adequate samples) versus when results may be uninformative (inadequate samples), providing explicit reliability information for negative results without significantly complicating the overall procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The subjective, mechanical assessment of sample adequacy is replaced with an objective optical measurement system based on turbidity. This substitution provides quantifiable, reproducible criteria for determining sample adequacy, thereby enhancing the reliability of negative results through objective rather than subjective evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the confidence in test results by determining sample adequacy before testing, reducing costs and resource wastage by identifying inadequate samples early on and ensuring accurate interpretation of negative results.

Implementation Method 1

measuring a light scatter signal from the sample in the sample tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS8355132B2Sample adequacy measurement system having a plurality of sample tubes and using turbidity light scattering techniques
Publication Date: 2013.01.15 BECTON DICKINSON & CO
  • US8355132B2 patent drawing
  • US8355132B2 patent drawing
  • US8355132B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sample adequacy measurement system having sample tubes and a housing having a receptacle to receive the sample tubes. The housing has sample adequacy measurement stations that each have a light source and a sample detector. The light source generates an illumination beam directed into one of the sample tubes. The sample detector is positioned along the tube, and receives at least a portion of the illumination beam scattered by turbidity in the sample tube. The detector is positioned at the end of an emitted beam path that extends in a plane that is perpendicular to the vertical direction and is oriented at a non-perpendicular angle with respect to the longitudinal axis of the sample tube unit. This reduce the likelihood that the emitted beam will pass through a damaged portion of the respective one of the sample tubes by passing the light through a protected portion of the tube.