Turbine Abradable Coating Chemistries for CMC Oxidation Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing abradable coatings in gas turbine engines face issues such as porosity providing pathways for oxygen penetration and molten contaminant infiltration, leading to potential substrate compromise and cracking, especially when used with ceramic matrix composite substrates, and traditional dislocators like hBN are ineffective at high temperatures.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating fillers like alkaline earth or transition metal tungstates, molybdates, and rare earth phosphates as dislocators in the abradable coating, which have lower shear strength than the matrix, reducing porosity and enhancing abradability while maintaining structural stability at high temperatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If porosity is increased to achieve abradability, then wear resistance is improved, but oxygen penetration and molten contaminant infiltration increase compromising substrate bonding

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveabradabilityVSAvoidsubstrate bonding
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses controlled porosity in the abradable coating to enable wear resistance while managing the trade-off with substrate bonding. The coating is designed with specific porosity levels that allow abrasion while limiting harmful penetrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures combining ceramic matrix with controlled porosity and potential filler phases to achieve both abradability and protection against oxygen and molten contaminant infiltration, resolving the contradiction between wear resistance and substrate bonding integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If traditional hBN dislocator is used in abradable coating, then abradability is maintained, but oxidation/volatilization resistance is poor at temperatures above 1800°F

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveabradabilityVSAvoidoxidation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the dislocator material from traditional hBN to alternative chemistries that maintain low shear strength for abradability while providing superior oxidation and volatilization resistance at high temperatures above 1800°F.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops composite coating systems incorporating alternative dislocator materials that combine the desired mechanical properties for abrasion resistance with enhanced thermal stability and oxidation resistance, replacing hBN with materials suitable for high-temperature turbine environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If YSZ coating is applied to CMC substrate, then abradability is achieved, but CTE mismatch causes cracking and spallation during operation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveabradabilityVSAvoidcoating integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the coating material composition from YSZ to alternative ceramic chemistries with coefficients of thermal expansion matched to CMC substrates, eliminating CTE mismatch and preventing cracking and spallation while maintaining abradability through controlled porosity and dislocator phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed dislocator chemistries reduce the risk of substrate degradation and cracking by minimizing porosity and improving abradability, ensuring durability and effectiveness in high-temperature turbine environments.

Implementation Method 1

A dislocator may fill porosity in the matrix while not compromising abradability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity reduction: Porosity

Implementation Method 2

the hBN dislocator prevents sintering of the matrix and is softer than the matrix so as to deform under shear

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear deformation: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 3

the hBN dislocator prevents sintering of the matrix

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering prevention: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS12359586B2Dislocator chemistries for turbine abradable or machinable coating systems
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 RTX CORP
  • US12359586B2 patent drawing
  • US12359586B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A coated article (20;60) includes a substrate (22) and a coating (24;62) on the substrate. The coating includes at least a first layer (30). The first layer has: a matrix (50); and a filler (52) at 2.0% to 40% by volume in the first layer. The first layer is selected from alkaline earth or transition metal (M) tungstates (MWO4); alkaline earth molybdates (MMoO4); rare earth (RE) phosphates (REPO4); and combinations thereof.